diff --git a/Papers/NAR_Update_2026/latex/sections/methods_council_direction.tex b/Papers/NAR_Update_2026/latex/sections/methods_council_direction.tex
index 38592599..698a602f 100644
--- a/Papers/NAR_Update_2026/latex/sections/methods_council_direction.tex
+++ b/Papers/NAR_Update_2026/latex/sections/methods_council_direction.tex
@@ -1,5 +1,6 @@
 %% Direction assignment from reaction chemistry (LLM ensemble).
-%% \TBD values pending the full-database run, in progress.
+%% Run complete over all 45,644 reactions. The one remaining \TBD is the
+%% supplementary reference, pending final numbering.
 \subsection{Direction assignment from reaction chemistry}\label{sec:methods-council}
 
 Thermodynamic direction assignment is bounded by estimate coverage: a reaction
@@ -53,11 +54,11 @@ \subsection{Direction assignment from reaction chemistry}\label{sec:methods-coun
 so individual assignments can be reviewed rather than accepted in aggregate.
 Two properties of the method bear on how the calls should be used. The
 ensemble commits to a direction far more readily than the thermodynamic rules
-do, abstaining on \TBD[pct]\% of reactions where the rules decline on a
-substantial fraction of the database, so it supplies calls where none
-currently exist rather than reproducing the ones that do. And its stated
-confidence does not distinguish its correct calls from its incorrect ones, so
-confidence is not a usable filter for downstream integration. A systematic
+do, abstaining on 1.7\% of the reaction set where the existing rules decline
+on 48.7\% of it, so it supplies calls where none currently exist rather than
+reproducing the ones that do. And its stated confidence does not distinguish
+its correct calls from its incorrect ones, so confidence is not a usable
+filter for downstream integration. A systematic
 evaluation against measured equilibrium constants, and against the
 model-level consequences of adopting these calls, is deferred to follow-up
 work.