diff --git a/families/detr/README.md b/families/detr/README.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..3999fbff6d
--- /dev/null
+++ b/families/detr/README.md
@@ -0,0 +1,156 @@
+# DETR
+
+This family builds DETR object detectors (`facebook/detr-resnet-50`) for
+`image_to_boxes` as one TensorRT engine: ResNet-50 backbone, 1x1 input
+projection, sine position embeddings, a 6-layer encoder and a 6-layer decoder
+(d_model 256, 100 queries) and the class and box heads. The manifest builds
+batch 1, fp16, with image capacity 1333 x 1333. The family has no quantized
+build.
+
+## FP8 quantization study (not shipped)
+
+FP8 self-quantization of the transformer linears was built and measured on
+TensorRT 11.4 (and 11.1) for `facebook/detr-resnet-50`. It is not shipped: the
+best recipe (the encoder and decoder MLPs) is only 1.01x to 1.03x faster than
+fp16 at batch 1, and detection agreement with PyTorch drops from 0.995 to 0.975
+(precision and recall), although COCO AP does not change. This section records
+the recipe, the method and the numbers, so that the study does not have to be
+repeated. The FP8 code was not merged; this family has no FP8 build.
+
+### Summary and decision
+
+Recipe: FP8 for fc1 and fc2 of the 6 encoder and 6 decoder layers (24 linears).
+TensorRT 11.4, batch 1, 800 x 1067 input (the range over 800 x 800, 800 x 1067
+and 800 x 1333 is in brackets).
+
+| Item | fp16 (manifest) | FP8 MLPs (fp16 engine) | FP8 vs fp16 |
+|---|---|---|---|
+| Latency, B200 | 1.223 ms | 1.192 ms | 1.03x (1.026x to 1.033x) |
+| Latency, B300 | 1.113 ms | 1.098 ms | 1.01x (1.013x to 1.014x) |
+| Plan size, B200 / B300 | 82.06 / 82.10 MB | 70.16 / 70.24 MB | -14.5% / -14.4% |
+| COCO AP, B200 / B300 (PyTorch fp32 0.4241) | 0.4243 / 0.4248 | 0.4250 / 0.4242 | unchanged |
+| Precision / recall vs PyTorch, B200 | 0.9951 / 0.9961 | 0.9764 / 0.9726 | -0.02 |
+| Precision / recall vs PyTorch, B300 | 0.9953 / 0.9965 | 0.9756 / 0.9743 | -0.02 |
+| Non-finite outputs | 0 | 0 | none |
+
+Decision: do not ship FP8 for DETR.
+
+- Speed: 1 to 3 percent on B200 and about 1 percent on B300. The model is
+  launch bound: about 250 small plan layers, the GEMMs have at most 1050 rows, and
+  the ResNet-50 convolutions (a third of the time) have no FP8 path in this
+  family.
+- Quality: AP is unchanged, but 2 to 3 percent of the detections at score 0.5
+  differ from PyTorch (the fp16 engine: 0.5 percent).
+- Every other part either loses quality (encoder attention, decoder
+  cross-attention, box head), gives no speed (decoder self-attention, class
+  head) or does not build on TensorRT 11.4 (attention output projection).
+- The plan is 14.5 percent smaller; that alone is not a reason to ship.
+
+### Recipe that was measured
+
+No FP8 or NVFP4 checkpoint of DETR exists on the Hub, and no official
+quantization config exists for it. The start was the guideline for small
+encoders and vision models: all attention and MLP linears, per-tensor static
+activation scales, ModelOpt max calibration. Each part was then measured alone,
+and every part that loses quality or gives no speed was put back to fp16.
+
+| Choice | Decision |
+|---|---|
+| Quantized (24 of 100 linears) | `fc1`, `fc2` of the 6 encoder and 6 decoder layers |
+| fp16 | ResNet-50 backbone and 1x1 input projection (convolutions), attention q, k, v and `out_proj`, class and box heads, layer norms, position embedding, attention matmuls and softmax |
+| Graph | `input -> Quantize -> Dequantize(fp16) -> MatMul`; weight `FP8 constant -> Dequantize(fp16)` |
+| Weight scale | per tensor, amax / 448 of each linear, at build time (FP8 weights not stored) |
+| Activation scale | static, per tensor; ModelOpt 0.46.1 `FP8_DEFAULT_CFG` (max calibration) on the transformers PyTorch model, 300 COCO validation images at native size, batch 1 |
+| Outlier rule | a scale above 20x the median of its kind stays fp16; measured: none. The decoder layer-0 self-attention `v_proj` reads an all-zero input (the queries start at zero) and has no scale |
+| Dequantize type | fp16; no non-finite value, fp32 Dequantize was not needed |
+
+TensorRT picks real FP8 GEMMs for the MLPs (on B300:
+`cutlass3x_sm100 ... gemm_e4m3_e4m3_f32_f16_f16 ... bias_f16_relu`, 36 FP8
+layers in the plan).
+
+### Method
+
+- GPUs: B200 and B300, one GPU per job, all variants of one TensorRT version
+  built and timed in the same job; TensorRT 11.4.0.106 (target) and 11.1.0.106.
+  Family code at `94fcf143`, before the Task SDK migration (#2019).
+- Data: the first 800 validation images of `detection-datasets/coco` with their
+  COCO 2017 boxes. Calibration: every second image of the first 600 (300
+  images). Quality: 500 other images (held out).
+- Reference: transformers `DetrForObjectDetection` in fp32 with the same
+  preprocessed input. AP is `pycocotools` COCO box AP on the 500 images
+  (comparable only inside these tables). Precision and recall: detections at
+  score 0.5 matched to the PyTorch detections (same class, IoU at least 0.5).
+  Box IoU is the mean IoU of the matched boxes.
+- Non-finite scan: the 500 images and noise, white and black inputs, every
+  variant.
+- Speed: batch 1, random input of the given size, 30 warm-up runs, then 200
+  runs timed with CUDA events; 3 interleaved rounds over all variants, minimum
+  per variant.
+
+### Results
+
+Speed and size, both MLPs (x is fp16 time over FP8 time):
+
+| GPU | TensorRT | size | fp32 ms | fp16 ms | FP8 ms | x | plan MB fp16 to FP8 |
+|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
+| B200 | 11.4 | 800x1067 | 2.160 | 1.223 | 1.192 | 1.026 | 82.06 to 70.16 |
+| B200 | 11.4 | 800x1333 | 2.491 | 1.338 | 1.296 | 1.033 | |
+| B200 | 11.4 | 800x800 | 1.734 | 1.113 | 1.078 | 1.032 | |
+| B300 | 11.4 | 800x1067 | 2.012 | 1.113 | 1.098 | 1.013 | 82.10 to 70.24 |
+| B300 | 11.4 | 800x1333 | 2.341 | 1.205 | 1.189 | 1.014 | |
+| B300 | 11.4 | 800x800 | 1.617 | 1.013 | 1.000 | 1.013 | |
+| B200 | 11.1 | 800x1067 | 2.154 | 1.253 | 1.223 | 1.025 | 82.09 to 70.24 |
+| B300 | 11.1 | 800x1067 | 2.055 | 1.153 | 1.139 | 1.013 | 82.16 to 70.25 |
+
+Each part alone (TensorRT 11.4, 500 held-out images; quality on B300, speed x
+at 800 x 1067 on B200 / B300):
+
+| Engine | FP8 linears | AP | prec / rec vs PyTorch | box IoU | x B200 / B300 |
+|---|---|---|---|---|---|
+| PyTorch fp32 | - | 0.4241 | - | - | - |
+| fp16 engine | 0 | 0.4248 | 0.9953 / 0.9965 | 0.991 | 1 / 1 |
+| encoder MLP | 12 | 0.4246 | 0.979 / 0.977 | 0.976 | 1.011 / 1.010 |
+| decoder MLP | 12 | 0.4245 | 0.988 / 0.988 | 0.985 | 1.022 / 1.007 |
+| **both MLPs (the recipe)** | 24 | **0.4242** | 0.976 / 0.974 | 0.974 | **1.026 / 1.013** |
+| decoder self-attention q, k, v | 17 | 0.4248 | 0.988 / 0.990 | 0.984 | 0.995 / 0.996 |
+| both MLPs + decoder self-attention | 41 | 0.4241 | 0.975 / 0.970 | 0.971 | 1.007 / 1.000 |
+| encoder self-attention q, k, v | 18 | 0.4178 | 0.969 / 0.961 | 0.936 | 0.992 / 0.989 |
+| decoder cross-attention q, k, v | 18 | 0.4177 | 0.945 / 0.943 | 0.917 | 0.997 / 0.995 |
+| class head | 1 | 0.4233 | 0.981 / 0.988 | 0.989 | 1.004 / 1.003 |
+| box head (3 linears) | 3 | 0.3760 | 0.921 / 0.922 | 0.845 | 1.005 / 1.000 |
+| every part that builds (`out_proj` excluded) | 81 | 0.3666 | 0.861 / 0.849 | 0.835 | 0.999 / 0.990 |
+| attention `out_proj` (TensorRT 11.1 only) | 18 | 0.4231 | 0.981 / 0.983 | 0.968 | 0.983 / 0.989 |
+
+B200 quality is within 0.003 AP and 0.006 precision or recall of the B300 row;
+11.1 gives the same picture. All variants were finite on every input.
+
+Time split (B300, TensorRT 11.4, fp16, 800 x 1067, layer profiler, which adds
+overhead): 2.37 ms in total, of which 0.80 ms (34 percent) is the fused ResNet
+convolutions; the rest is spread over about 250 other plan layers of 10 to 50
+microseconds each. The GEMMs
+have 850 rows (800 x 1067) to 1050 rows (800 x 1333) and 256 or 2048 columns,
+too small to keep the GPU busy, so FP8 saves only a few microseconds per GEMM.
+
+### NVFP4 (not tried)
+
+The transformer has 17.3 M weights (34.6 MB in fp16, a few microseconds of
+reads), against a 1.0 to 1.4 ms run, so the model is not limited by weight
+reads. FP8 gives 1 to 3 percent, and NVFP4 would lose more quality than FP8.
+
+### What was not tried
+
+| Item | Note |
+|---|---|
+| FP8 for the backbone convolutions | no FP8 convolution path in this family |
+| Batch above 1 | the family builds batch 1 only |
+| Percentile or entropy calibration, per-channel weight scales | not measured |
+| Full 5000-image COCO validation, H100, native runtime with an FP8 bundle | not measured |
+
+### When to revisit
+
+- A larger batch or a larger DETR (wider d_model, more queries), where the
+  transformer GEMMs are large enough for FP8 to pay.
+- FP8 convolutions for the ResNet-50 backbone, which is a third of the time.
+- A TensorRT release that builds FP8 `out_proj` behind the fused attention (11.4
+  fails with "Could not find any implementation for node"; 11.1 builds it but
+  gives no speed).