There appears to be a bug in handling skipping long lines. I think there should be an else condition before returning in ValueError. That is, long lines are checking in "if not at_eof" and then there should be an "else: return" if we are at_eof. Currently any long line will stop all further evaluation (e.g. if using poll()).
Separately, it would be great to be able to handle long lines in general. For example, this comes up in FIX logs when receiving security definitions. Perhaps there could be an option that emulates fh.readline()?
There appears to be a bug in handling skipping long lines. I think there should be an else condition before returning in ValueError. That is, long lines are checking in "if not at_eof" and then there should be an "else: return" if we are at_eof. Currently any long line will stop all further evaluation (e.g. if using poll()).
Separately, it would be great to be able to handle long lines in general. For example, this comes up in FIX logs when receiving security definitions. Perhaps there could be an option that emulates fh.readline()?