currently scenarios are written like unit tests. very small and isolated. however running every scenario takes ages with bazel. we should test multiple things per scenario. this will implicitly make the scenarios themselfes more realistic.
hint: attempt to follow realistic score scenarios
included or follow-up:
gap: add scenario with pytest and gtest. with a passing, failing, skipped, and errored testcase. Based on #774 the parser should be way more defensive, e.g. unknown attribute = error.
currently scenarios are written like unit tests. very small and isolated. however running every scenario takes ages with bazel. we should test multiple things per scenario. this will implicitly make the scenarios themselfes more realistic.
hint: attempt to follow realistic score scenarios
included or follow-up:
gap: add scenario with pytest and gtest. with a passing, failing, skipped, and errored testcase. Based on #774 the parser should be way more defensive, e.g. unknown attribute = error.