Skip to content

ACTIVATION AUDIT: ship-soon #7

Open

Description

@4444J99

Identity: Reverse Engine Recursive Run is a standard IV-plane pipeline repo with source-only deliverable.
Frozen-state classification: built-never-deployed
Shipped-test: FAIL: no release asset or live endpoint exists in repository metadata.

Activation path:

  1. Define build artifact and publication target in manifest/workflows.
  2. Attach release artifacts to tagged builds for user consumption.
  3. Provide one-command validation in README and publish result link in seed metadata.

Activity

  1. github-actions commented on Aug 10, 2026

    @github-actions

    This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will remain open — this label is informational only; this project never auto-closes.

  2. 4444J99 commented on Aug 31, 2026

    @4444J99
    OwnerAuthor

    Execution plan

    Outcome
    Produce a reviewable, evidence-backed disposition for ACTIVATION AUDIT: ship-soon and close #7 only after its acceptance predicate is demonstrably satisfied.

    Current scope
    Identity: Reverse Engine Recursive Run is a standard IV-plane pipeline repo with source-only deliverable. Frozen-state classification: built-never-deployed Shipped-test: FAIL: no release asset or live endpoint exists in repository metadata. Activation path: 1. Define build artifact and publication target in manifest/workflows. 2. Attach release artifacts to …

    Prerequisites / dependencies

    • Re-read the default branch plus repository-local AGENTS.md, CONTRIBUTING.md, governance, and issue templates before editing.
    • Revalidate that this issue is still current, uniquely owned, and not superseded; explicit cross-references currently visible: none stated.
    • Turn every stated checklist or requirement in the body into a concrete acceptance check; document any unavailable fixture, credential, platform, or upstream dependency on this issue.

    Bounded work packets (in order)

    1. Reproduce or inventory the present state and record the smallest failing or missing acceptance predicate for “ACTIVATION AUDIT: ship-soon.”
    2. Implement the minimal coherent change on a non-protected branch, keeping unrelated cleanup out of scope.
    3. Add or update focused regression tests, static checks, fixtures, and operator documentation for the changed behavior.
    4. Run the repository-prescribed validation; record exact commands, versions, results, and the tested commit SHA.
    5. Open or update one owning pull request linked to ACTIVATION AUDIT: ship-soon #7; resolve review findings at exact head, then use only the repository's authorized merge rail.
    6. Attach the completion receipt here (merged commit/PR, acceptance evidence, residual risks) and close only when no acceptance item remains.

    Verification / acceptance evidence

    • Exact-head unit/integration tests and lint/type/security checks relevant to the touched surface pass, with logs or stable links.
    • Each body requirement is mapped to code, test, documentation, or an explicitly recorded non-code disposition.
    • Negative and rollback/failure-path behavior is exercised where applicable; no protected branch, review, or release control is bypassed.

    Human / external gates
    This item touches a human/external decision or authority boundary. The responsible owner must supply that decision/evidence; agents may prepare artifacts and validation but must not impersonate approval, rights, credentials, terms acceptance, release, deployment, or submission.

    Next action
    An eligible agent or maintainer should perform packet 1 now: re-read the live default branch and convert the issue's current scope into an executable acceptance checklist before changing code.

  3. 4444J99 commented on Aug 31, 2026

    @4444J99
    OwnerAuthor

    Execution plan

    Outcome
    Produce a reviewable, evidence-backed disposition for ACTIVATION AUDIT: ship-soon and close #7 only after its acceptance predicate is demonstrably satisfied.

    Current scope
    Identity: Reverse Engine Recursive Run is a standard IV-plane pipeline repo with source-only deliverable. Frozen-state classification: built-never-deployed Shipped-test: FAIL: no release asset or live endpoint exists in repository metadata. Activation path: 1. Define build artifact and publication target in manifest/workflows. 2. Attach release artifacts to …

    Prerequisites / dependencies

    • Re-read the default branch and repository-local instructions/governance before editing.
    • Confirm this issue is current, uniquely owned, and not superseded; visible cross-references: none stated.
    • Convert every stated requirement/checklist item into a concrete acceptance check; record unavailable fixtures, credentials, platforms, or upstream dependencies here.

    Bounded work packets (in order)

    1. Reproduce or inventory the live state and record the smallest failing or missing predicate for “ACTIVATION AUDIT: ship-soon.”
    2. Implement the minimal coherent change on a non-protected branch; keep unrelated cleanup out of scope.
    3. Add focused regression tests, static checks, fixtures, and operator/user documentation for the changed behavior.
    4. Run repository-prescribed validation and record exact commands, versions, results, and tested commit SHA.
    5. Open or update one owning PR linked to ACTIVATION AUDIT: ship-soon #7; resolve exact-head review findings, then use only the authorized merge rail.
    6. Attach a completion receipt (merged commit/PR, mapped acceptance evidence, residual risks) and close only when no acceptance item remains.

    Verification / acceptance evidence

    • Exact-head tests and relevant lint/type/security/build checks pass with logs or stable links.
    • Every body requirement maps to code, test, documentation, or an explicit non-code disposition.
    • Negative and recovery/rollback paths are exercised where applicable; protected controls are not bypassed.

    Human / external gates
    This item touches a human/external authority boundary. The responsible owner must supply that decision/evidence; agents may prepare artifacts but must not impersonate approval, rights, credentials, terms acceptance, release, deployment, publication, or submission.

    Next action
    Perform packet 1 now: re-read the live default branch and turn this issue's present scope into an executable acceptance checklist before changing code.

  4. 4444J99 commented on Sep 23, 2026

    @4444J99
    OwnerAuthor

    @jules Execute the existing bounded activation plan on current main@e194dd88def85aa1c3cabd955ec63cff3a8027c1 in one PR. This is source/CI preparation only: do not publish, tag, release, deploy, alter repository settings, or use credentials.

    Fresh packet-1 evidence: pyproject.toml declares project reverse-engine-recursive-run but its setuptools discovery is where = ["scripts"] with include = [], so a built wheel can be structurally empty even though the repo contains runnable analysis tooling. The repo also contains Dockerfile.analysis, tests, a Makefile, and existing CI/release-support files.

    Please repair only the verifiable artifact path:

    1. Inspect the current scripts/ layout and existing documented entry commands. Make the package/build manifest include the intended distributable Python code without moving/rearchitecting unrelated source. Add project scripts only where they map directly to existing stable entrypoints.
    2. Add/extend CI to build wheel/sdist, inspect the wheel contents, clean-install it, and run one deterministic offline validation command against the installed artifact. CI build outputs may be uploaded as workflow artifacts only.
    3. Pin any GitHub Action touched/added by this PR to a full immutable SHA with readable version comment; preserve current required tests/lint/type checks and make artifact verification fail closed.
    4. Update README with one-command local build/install/validation grounded in the actual artifact. Do not claim a public release or live endpoint.
    5. Do not modify governance files, generated agent context, secrets, external services, seed.yaml result links, or downstream repositories merely to manufacture a shipped state.
    6. Run focused tests, lint/type/build validation, wheel-content check, clean-install smoke, and available workflow static validation; report exact changed SHA/results.
    7. Use Refs #7, not Fixes #7; external publication/tagged release remains a separate human-authorized acceptance predicate.
  5. google-labs-jules commented on Sep 23, 2026

    @google-labs-jules

    Jules is on it. When finished, you will see another comment and be able to review a PR.

  6. google-labs-jules commented on Sep 23, 2026

    @google-labs-jules

    Ready for a review! A PR has been created.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions