[AdaWorldAPI]

Adds .mermaid/: eleven Markdown pages with 31 Mermaid diagrams that map the stack the Foundry parity work rests on. Each diagram lists the path:line it was drawn from. All pages share one status legend: green = on main, yellow = lab crate, blue = open PR, red dashed = gap (not built).

page	what it maps
README	index, legend, reading order
01	layers: contract → dt64 → execution → authorization → write/scenario → lab
02	Cargo edges read from each Cargo.toml; workspace members vs excluded crates; git edges to and from OGAR
03	DR route log, map table, frames, guards, lanes, ClassView/BindStore; bind-then-borrow with every refusal
04	a governed read from a sealed frame to a mask; the G2 gap
05	MethodBinding ON × WHEN × DO: WHEN via relalg (G6 lab, PR #1996), DO via lance-graph-r2il binding/binding_native
06	ogar-auth → ogar-rbac → lance-graph-rbac, two routes: authorize_user → authorize_scoped → ScopedDecision; authorize_identity → authorize_memberships → MembershipDecision
07	write path: the thought-git Rubicon, the probe's commit_cycle stand-in beside the shipped LanceCycleWriter, xlog stage/commit; the G4 gap
08	scenarios: SlotPool::branch, next_version, squash gate, stage_closure; the G3 gap
09	Foundry parity status map (an evidence map, not a parity claim)
10	lance-graph-java crosswalk: Panama and Valhalla membranes, the G11 contract fence; no DT64 wiring exists

What changes in existing behaviour: none. Docs only.

How it was checked

• Every Mermaid block renders with mmdc.
• Cargo edges were read from the manifests.
• A sample of 21 citations, drawn from every page, was re-read in source: all 21 name the stated symbol at the stated line. Line numbers drift as files change.

Findings from mapping, which correct the earlier fact sheet and plan:

• authorize_identity does not reach authorize_scoped.
• The production cycle writer (WalSink::commit_cycle, implemented by LanceCycleWriter) exists on main beside the probe stand-in.
• lance-graph-dt64-lance: DR's map table made durable through the fire-and-forget cycle writer #1993 is merged.

The plan corrections are on #1996 (7a944aa).

Board reference: EXO Linear (EXO-227).

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

https://claude.ai/code/session_01XAqKMPJjVvasjwqhjJ6c9p

[coderabbitai]

Important

• Trigger review

This repository does not receive automatic reviews because it has fewer than 10 stars.

Run configuration

• Source mode: Auto
• Repository: Unavailable
• Branch: Unavailable
• File: No configuration file from this repository applied
• Commit: Unavailable
• Layers: Organization UI
• Review profile: CHILL
• Plan: Advanced
• Run ID: a2645609-5251-4903-9df9-6b1cfd0b3e40

• Autofix · Keep fixing CodeRabbit findings and required CI, and resolving merge conflicts

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

Codex Review Summary: ✅ Completed

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review	Status	Commit	Review trigger
📝 Code Review	✅ Completed 2026-11-10T22:29:30.336660Z	531f231	Draft marked ready

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

• Open a pull request for review
• Mark a draft as ready
• Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.