Skip to content

docs: clarify prepared-reference startup ownership and current Skill specification #133

Closed

Description

@anycodes

The current template guide recommends CLI preparation followed by Python launch without explaining that ordinary native deployment may retain its own service startup. This can duplicate a manifest start command. The SDK Skill also says strict specification 4 above its actual specification 5 manifest.

Expected: source users start through unified CLI launch and connect with the SDK; advanced prepared-reference users understand that native/image startup must not duplicate the manifest service. Both languages must agree. Skill prose must say specification 5.

Scope: documentation and engineering records only; no runtime, aliases, preparation mode or package release. Existing bounded official client/server a6 startup and application-auth observation passed, including independent owned-resource absence; do not treat another preparation path as equivalent.

Acceptance: bilingual consumption and authoring guidance, Skill typo, changelog and owner evidence; required exact-head CI/review and normal merge.

Activity

  1. anycodes commented on Oct 25, 2026

    @anycodes
    ContributorAuthor

    Delivered in normally merged documentation-only PR #134, actual main 676ef04; merge tree independently equals reviewed head 7440407. All 13 exact-head required checks passed, including distributions and both public runtime fixtures.

    English/Chinese template consumption, authoring and design overviews now distinguish unified CLI launch followed by SDK connection from advanced Python-owned prepared-reference startup. Native startup must not duplicate the manifest service. The Skill prose matches specification 5. The bounded actual official-a6 startup/auth observation and independent owned cleanup are recorded with their precise scope; earlier failures and evidence are unchanged. No runtime, API, alias, package version or new release changed. Actual closed state independently confirmed.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions