Feature/set version refactor - #43
Open
mgershe wants to merge 2 commits into
Open
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
P1B: Starter Task: Refactoring PR
Use this pull request template to briefly answer the questions below in one to two sentences each.
Feel free to delete this text at the top after filling out the template.
1. Issue
Link to the associated GitHub issue:#34
Full path to the refactored file: script/upgrade-opentui.ts:45
What do you think this file does?
It is a maintenance script that automatically updates and standardizes OpenTUI dependency versions across the monorepo while preserving correct version prefixes and ranges.
What is the scope of your refactoring within that file?
setVersion function
Which Qlty‑reported issue did you address?
2. Refactoring
How did the specific issue you chose impact the codebase’s maintainability?
High cognitive load and any different return branches makes the code harder to read and harder to extend
What changes did you make to resolve the issue?
changed the return branches to a single if/else if branch and a single return variable
How do your changes improve maintainability? Did you consider alternatives?
The function is now more clear and easy to read showing a linear logic and adding support for if there's a need for a new prefix
3. Validation
How did you validate that the change is correct?
Could not debug testing errors
Attach a screenshot of the test coverage showing the lines were executed by the tests.
N/A
Attach a screenshot showing the tests that cover the change passing during CI
N/A
Attach a screenshot of
qlty smells --no-snippets <full/path/to/file.ts>showing fewer reported issues after the changes.