Skip to content

[MEDIUM] AI service has no request body size limit #137

Closed

Description

@kilodesodiq-arch

Engineering Gap

FastAPI application in app/ai-service/main.py has no request body size limit configured. Large payloads (malicious or accidental) could exhaust memory.

Codebase Evidence

  • app/ai-service/main.py line 76-83: FastAPI app created without max_request_body_size or middleware
  • No ASGI middleware for body size limiting

Risk Profile

Memory exhaustion from large request bodies. DoS vector.

Remediation Strategy

Add ASGI middleware or Uvicorn configuration to limit request body size (e.g., 10MB). Return 413 for oversized requests.

Success Conditions

  • Request body size limit enforced
  • 413 response for oversized requests
  • Limit documented

Change Surface

Files: main.py, Uvicorn config

Security Review

Mitigates DoS via large payloads.

Completion Checklist

  • Implementation completed
  • Peer reviewed
  • Tests passing
  • Ready for merge

Activity

  1. jaynomyaro commented on Jun 16, 2026

    @jaynomyaro
    Contributor

    Hi! I’m a full-stack developer with a strong blockchain background. I’d love to handle this issue and can deliver a clean, reliable solution. Kindly assign it to me.

  2. ameeribro4-sudo commented on Jun 17, 2026

    @ameeribro4-sudo
    Contributor

    Can I take this?

  3. gbengaeben commented on Jun 21, 2026

    @gbengaeben
    Contributor

    Hi Maintainer,

    I’d love to work on this issue. I’ve reviewed the requirements and believe I can implement the solution according to the project’s guidelines and best practices.

    If the issue is available, I’d be happy to take ownership and submit a PR for review.

    Thank you for your consideration.

  4. grantfox-oss commented on Jun 21, 2026

    @grantfox-oss

    🦊 GrantFox — @gbengaeben has been assigned to this issue as part of the Official Campaign campaign!

    Next steps:

    1. Open a Pull Request referencing this issue (e.g., Closes #137)
    2. Your PR will be reviewed by the ChainForgee maintainers

    Good luck! Track your progress on GrantFox.

  5. grantfox-oss commented on Jun 22, 2026

    @grantfox-oss

    🎉 This issue has been marked as completed on GrantFox as part of the Official Campaign campaign!

    @gbengaeben's PR #192 was approved and merged by @kilodesodiq-arch.

    🏆 @gbengaeben: You earned 35 FoxPoints for this contribution! Your current tier: Explorer (293 total points). Track your full progress on GrantFox.

    👏 Great work, @gbengaeben! Keep contributing to ChainForgee.

  6. added a commit that references this issue on Jun 22, 2026
    2c9a0ae
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

GrantFox OSSIssue tracked in GrantFox OSSMaybe RewardedIssue may be eligible for a GrantFox rewardOfficial CampaignCampaign: Official CampaignmediumsecuritySecurity vulnerabilities and hardening

Type

No type

Projects

No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions