[kikoveiga]

What and why?

Keep the Android flushAndDeinitialize() test helper flushing pending events before stopping the SDK. Its reflection lookup hardcodes a Kotlin JVM method suffix that changes with the built-in Kotlin migration in DataDog/dd-sdk-android#4060, causing the flush to be silently skipped and potentially losing final events in integration/E2E tests.

How?

• Call Datadog._internalProxy().flushAndShutdownExecutors(), matching the existing flush helper, and remove the unused reflection helper.
• Add a regression test verifying flush → stop → method-channel success ordering.
• Keep the existing Android SDK dependency version.

Validation

• Android native unit suite: 77 tests passed; the new regression test fails before the fix and passes afterward.
• melos run analyze:android --no-select: passed (existing script scope).
• Flutter unit tests passed in 16 packages, including the affected Android plugin; the two remaining example/test apps are blocked by missing local .env assets.
• Repository Dart checks report formatting differences in three unchanged Dart files and missing example .env assets / existing analyzer notices.

Review checklist

• This pull request has appropriate unit and / or integration tests
• This pull request references a Github or JIRA issue

[datadog-prod-us1-5]

_{This comment will be updated automatically if new data arrives.
🔗 Commit SHA: 636970a | Docs | View more details | Give us feedback!}

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review	Status	Commit	Review trigger
📝 Code Review	✅ Completed 2026-10-30T12:22:34.167758Z	636970a	Draft marked ready
🔒 Security Review	✅ Completed 2026-10-30T12:23:23.816384Z	636970a	Draft marked ready

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

• Open a pull request for review
• Mark a draft as ready
• Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

[datadog-prod-us1-5]

More details

The shutdown helper reaches the existing flush API without relying on Kotlin’s mangled method suffix, preserving flush → stop → success ordering. The specialist identified no actionable defects in the implementation or regression test.

Was this helpful? React 👍 or 👎

_{Open Bits AI session}

_{🤖 Bits Code Review · Commit 636970a}