An agent skill tree for HPC performance work. A root skill turns a human question ("why is this slow?") into a measurement request, routes it to the cheapest tool expert that can answer it, and adjudicates what comes back. Each child skill owns exactly one profiler and runs the same closed loop:
profile → normalize → optimize → benchmark → reprofile → verify → report
The point is not to run profilers. It is to return rewrites you can trust: a change with a measured, significant speedup, a passing correctness oracle, and a reprofile proving the speedup came from where the diagnosis said it would.
Both agents use the same skill format — a directory holding SKILL.md with name and
description frontmatter, plus optional scripts/, references/, assets/. Only the
discovery path differs, so the tree is exposed at both, from one set of files:
| Claude Code | Codex | |
|---|---|---|
| repo-local skills | .claude/skills/ |
.agents/skills/ |
| repo instructions | CLAUDE.md |
AGENTS.md |
.agents/skills is a symlink to .claude/skills, and CLAUDE.md is a symlink to AGENTS.md
— one source of truth each, nothing to keep in sync. Edit .claude/skills/ and AGENTS.md.
Skills are written to the common denominator: plain markdown, paths relative to the repo root,
scripts invoked as python3 <path>, and no agent-specific variables like ${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}.
.claude/skills/
profile-weaver/ root dispatcher — framing, routing, adjudication
SKILL.md
references/
routing.md bottleneck taxonomy, cost model, escalation ladder
registry.md installed children + their cost/insight/preconditions ← hand-edited
pw-perf/ child: Linux perf (worked example)
SKILL.md
references/tool-notes.md
pw-gvprof/ child: GVProf GPU redundancy — PARTIAL, wraps external/
SKILL.md
references/tool-notes.md
pw-gpa/ child: GPA/HPCToolkit CUDA PGO — wraps external/
SKILL.md
pw-drgpum/ child: DrGPUM GPU *memory* — wraps external/; optimizes peak
SKILL.md bytes, not time
pw-hpctoolkit/ child: stock HPCToolkit GPU profiling — wraps external/;
SKILL.md collect-only, the first rung for a GPU workload
.agents/skills ─────────> symlink to .claude/skills, so Codex sees the same tree
AGENTS.md repo instructions for Codex; CLAUDE.md is a symlink to it
templates/child-skill/ copy this to build a new child
external/ vendored upstream code a child wraps — never edited casually
gvprof-agent-skill/ separate git repo (Honrrii/gvprof-agent-skill)
gpa-agent-skill/ the GPA PGO loop: nine steps, a KEPT/REVERTED ledger, and a
cross-benchmark prior. Needs $PW_GPA_ROOT (a built GPA install)
drgpum-agent-skill/ the DrGPUM memory pipeline (4 skills) + its `agent/` package,
pruned to the core skill; see its PROVENANCE.md. Needs a DrGPUM
install to capture profiles
hpctoolkit-agent-skill/ the HPCToolkit collect workflow + a matmul example; no upstream
git, so ProfileWeaver tracks it. See its PROVENANCE.md
shared/
schema/
profile.schema.json normalized profile — the cross-tool comparison contract
benchmark.schema.json timing campaign with correctness + significance
rewrite-report.schema.json a child's deliverable, including the trust gates
scripts/
bench.py repeated timing, interleaved A/B, bootstrap CI, oracle check
validate.py schema validation (uses jsonschema if present, else built-in subset)
tokens.py skill-definition + end-to-end token cost, per agent
runs/ one directory per investigation, id = YYYYMMDD-HHMMSS-<slug>
A run directory:
runs/<run-id>/
brief.md the dispatch brief from the root
preflight.json tool version, permissions, baseline variance, oracle check
raw/ untouched profiler output — never deleted
profile.baseline.json normalized, schema-valid
variants/<name>.patch
bench.*.json one record per timing campaign
profile.variant.json the reprofile
cost.json what the investigation consumed (tokens, per agent)
report.json / report.md the deliverable
The root filters children by preconditions (can this machine even run it?), then by insight (can this granularity answer the question?), then sorts by cost (overhead × runtime + rebuild + setup). It starts coarse and escalates only when the current rung cannot answer — a narrowed scope from a cheap tool is what makes an expensive tool affordable.
See routing.md for the taxonomy, cost bands, and the five-rung escalation ladder.
A child's report is only verified when all six pass:
| Gate | Passes when |
|---|---|
| Correctness | the oracle passed on the variant, tolerance stated |
| Significance | speedup CI excludes 1.0, reps ≥ 5, conditions matched |
| Mechanism | the reprofile shows the targeted hotspot shrinking |
| No collateral | nothing else regressed unexplained |
| Attribution | every causal claim cites a metric the tool actually measures |
| Reproducible | command, build, host, tool version, run id recorded |
Anything less is reported as proposed, never as a speedup. A well-characterized negative
result is a real deliverable.
cp -r templates/child-skill .claude/skills/pw-<tool>- Fill every TODO in
SKILL.mdandreferences/tool-notes.md. Keep the seven stages and the gate table — children differ in tool mechanics, not in method. - Add a row to registry.md. A child not in the registry will not be routed to.
- Update its declared cost with the observed overhead after the first real run.
The registry's "candidate children" table lists the suggested build order, each entry covering a column of the taxonomy the installed set cannot currently reach.
When a child is backed by an upstream project, vendor it under external/ and keep the child
skill a thin wrapper in .claude/skills/. Do not drop the upstream repo into
.claude/skills/ — that directory is scanned for SKILL.md at each child's root, so a repo
without one registers as nothing at all, and skills it ships one level deeper (in its own
.claude/skills/ or .agents/skills/) are not reached from this repo's root either.
The wrapper's job is translation: delegate mechanics to upstream's CLI, normalize its output to
profile.schema.json, and report against the gates. Leave upstream files untouched so a later
pull does not silently revert local edits. pw-gvprof is the worked example.
Not every tool can run all seven stages. pw-gvprof reads pre-captured artifacts (no stage 2)
and reports a proxy metric with no time dimension. That is fine — but it must be declared in
the registry, because it changes which gates can pass. A child that cannot reprofile can never
pass the mechanism gate on its own, so its honest ceiling is status: proposed. Declare the
limit; do not let the loop imply a completeness the tool does not have.
Ask the root skill a performance question — profile-weaver frames it, picks a child, and
reports back. Invoke a child directly (pw-perf) when you already know which tool you want.
The shared scripts stand alone too:
python3 shared/scripts/bench.py --label variant-tiling --reps 7 \
--baseline-command "./app in.deck" --oracle "python3 check.py out.dat ref.dat" \
--out runs/<run-id>/bench.tiling.json -- ./app.tiled in.deck
python3 shared/scripts/validate.py shared/schema/profile.schema.json \
runs/<run-id>/profile.baseline.json