Skip to content

fix(data): restore release years of 5 MediaTek and Qualcomm SoCs from their raw chipset text - #306

Merged
Seungpyo1007 merged 1 commit into
developfrom
fix/soc-raw-years
Sep 26, 2026
Merged

Seungpyo1007 merged 1 commit into
developfrom
fix/soc-raw-years

Conversation

@Seungpyo1007

@Seungpyo1007 Seungpyo1007 commented Sep 26, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

What & why

Five SoCs carried late placeholder release years (YYYY-01-01, about 2 years late). Each record's own raw_chipset gives the real year, and the values match the chip announcements:

SoC was now
Helio A22 MT6761 2019 2018
Helio P90 MT6779 2019 2018
Helio A20 MT6761D 2020 2019
Snapdragon 200 MSM8210 2015 2013
Snapdragon 620/652 MSM8976 2018 2015

Files move to the matching year folder; slugs are unchanged. Helio A20's gpu_name now matches its raw text (PowerVR GE8300, not GE8320). Closes #296.

Found while diagnosing the 996 red SoCs. Those have no failing checks: they are placeholder imports ("Unknown mobile GPU", " mobile platform ") with only a weak source, so red is the correct band. No scoring change.

Source

The records' own raw_chipset.

Checklist

  • The PR targets develop
  • python -m app.validate passes locally
  • Files live at the correct data/soc/<mfr>/<year>/ path

… their raw chipset text

Helio A22 and P90 (2018), Helio A20 (2019), Snapdragon 200 (2013) and
Snapdragon 620/652 (2015) had late placeholder years; the year in each
record's raw_chipset is used and files move to the matching year folder.
Helio A20's GPU now matches its raw text (PowerVR GE8300).

Refs #296
@github-actions github-actions Bot added bug Something isn't working data Dataset changes enhancement New feature or request labels Sep 26, 2026
@TechEngineBot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

🔎 Data verification — Tier 0 (offline existence/trust)

Scored by app.verify; posted by TechEngineBot. Informational only — the structural gate (app.validate) is separate and authoritative for merge.

12/12 categories ? 191,814 records ? diff base develop@8194a14

Changed records in this PR

5 record(s) assessed.

Software and website assess required fields and sources only; domain consistency rules are unavailable and these categories cannot earn green.

%%{init: {"theme":"base","themeVariables":{"pie1":"#3fb950","pie2":"#d29922","pie3":"#f85149","pieStrokeWidth":"0px","pieOpacity":"1"}}}%%
pie showData
    title Verification bands — all records
    "Green" : 0
    "Yellow" : 0
    "Red" : 5
Loading
Category Distribution Total 🟢 🟡 🔴 🟢 %
soc 🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥 5 0 0 5 0.0%
All 🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥 5 0 0 5 0.0%

Full-dataset baseline

191814 record(s) assessed.

Software and website assess required fields and sources only; domain consistency rules are unavailable and these categories cannot earn green.

%%{init: {"theme":"base","themeVariables":{"pie1":"#3fb950","pie2":"#d29922","pie3":"#f85149","pieStrokeWidth":"0px","pieOpacity":"1"}}}%%
pie showData
    title Verification bands — all records
    "Green" : 24725
    "Yellow" : 166034
    "Red" : 1055
Loading
Category Distribution Total 🟢 🟡 🔴 🟢 %
brand 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨 207 122 85 0 58.9%
soc 🟩🟩🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥 2117 284 837 996 13.4%
smartphone 🟩🟩🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟥 93407 18003 75350 54 19.3%
tablet 🟩🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟥 3459 292 3166 1 8.4%
watch 🟩🟩🟩🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟥 447 94 350 3 21.0%
pda 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨 140 83 57 0 59.3%
gpu 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟨🟨🟨 2076 1529 547 0 73.7%
cpu 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟨🟥 4507 4211 295 1 93.4%
laptop 🟩🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨 1995 107 1888 0 5.4%
monitor 🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨 882 0 882 0 0.0%
software 🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨 42493 0 42493 0 0.0%
website 🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨 40084 0 40084 0 0.0%
All 🟩🟩🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟥 191814 24725 166034 1055 12.9%

Hard violations (forced red):

Count Check
1 !boost_ge_base

green = authoritative source + complete + consistent · yellow = plausible, needs confirmation · red = sparse/weak source or a hard contradiction. Promotion to verified runs in the scheduled verify-network workflow.

@Seungpyo1007
Seungpyo1007 merged commit ede1c9b into develop Sep 26, 2026
5 checks passed
@TechEngineBot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

TechEngine change review: PASS

12/12 categories ? 191,814 records ? diff base develop@8194a14

Check Result
python -m app.validate PASS
Changed dump JSON and manifest/index counts PASS
New hard integrity anomalies vs PR base PASS

Changed data

Category Added Modified Deleted Added verified Added unverified Added Kaggle-sourced
brand 0 0 0 0 0 0
soc 5 0 5 0 5 5
smartphone 0 0 0 0 0 0
tablet 0 0 0 0 0 0
watch 0 0 0 0 0 0
pda 0 0 0 0 0 0
gpu 0 0 0 0 0 0
cpu 0 0 0 0 0 0
laptop 0 0 0 0 0 0
monitor 0 0 0 0 0 0
software 0 0 0 0 0 0
website 0 0 0 0 0 0

Changed record examples

soc added

  • soc/mediatek/2018/mediatek-helio-a22-mt6761.json - MediaTek Helio A22 MT6761
  • soc/mediatek/2018/mediatek-helio-p90-mt6779v-cu.json - MediaTek Helio P90 MT6779V/CU
  • soc/mediatek/2019/mediatek-helio-a20-mt6761d.json - MediaTek Helio A20 MT6761D
  • soc/qualcomm/2013/qualcomm-snapdragon-200-msm8210.json - Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 MSM8210
  • soc/qualcomm/2015/qualcomm-snapdragon-620-msm8976-snapdragon-652.json - Qualcomm Snapdragon 620 MSM8976 / Snapdragon 652

soc deleted

  • soc/mediatek/2019/mediatek-helio-a22-mt6761.json - MediaTek Helio A22 MT6761
  • soc/mediatek/2019/mediatek-helio-p90-mt6779v-cu.json - MediaTek Helio P90 MT6779V/CU
  • soc/mediatek/2020/mediatek-helio-a20-mt6761d.json - MediaTek Helio A20 MT6761D
  • soc/qualcomm/2015/qualcomm-snapdragon-200-msm8210.json - Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 MSM8210
  • soc/qualcomm/2018/qualcomm-snapdragon-620-msm8976-snapdragon-652.json - Qualcomm Snapdragon 620 MSM8976 / Snapdragon 652

Heuristic review

  • Added records by manufacturer/brand: mediatek: 3, qualcomm: 2
  • Added records by source class: kaggle: 5
  • Heuristic warnings: none found.

@TechEngineBot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

TechEngine validation stats: PASS

12/12 categories ? 191,814 records ? diff base develop@8194a14

Data summary

Category Total Verified Unverified Missing verified Tracked Verified % of tracked
brand 207 123 84 0 207 59.4%
soc 2117 249 1868 0 2117 11.8%
smartphone 93407 17556 75851 0 93407 18.8%
tablet 3459 288 3171 0 3459 8.3%
watch 447 91 356 0 447 20.4%
pda 140 74 66 0 140 52.9%
gpu 2076 1472 604 0 2076 70.9%
cpu 4507 3447 1060 0 4507 76.5%
laptop 1995 103 1892 0 1995 5.2%
monitor 882 0 882 0 882 0.0%
software 42493 0 42493 0 42493 0.0%
website 40084 0 40084 0 40084 0.0%
all 191814 23403 168411 0 191814 12.2%

Warning

Tracked verified coverage is below 50% for monitor 0.0% (0/882), software 0.0% (0/42493), website 0.0% (0/40084), laptop 5.2% (103/1995), tablet 8.3% (288/3459), soc 11.8% (249/2117), all 12.2% (23403/191814), smartphone 18.8% (17556/93407), and 1 more.
Tracked coverage excludes records missing the verified field; see the Missing verified column for those records.
This does not fail validation. Keep imported records verified: false until manual audit, but treat this as follow-up verification work before relying on the affected categories as curated data.

Validation notes

  • The integrity gate blocks only hard anomalies introduced by this PR relative to its merge base.
  • Full advisory outlier listings are suppressed on successful runs because they are dataset-wide and mostly stable between PRs.
  • Failure runs still include a detailed log excerpt for debugging.

Key output:

## app.validate
## integrity_check.py (PR head compared with PR base)
loaded CPU=4507 GPU=2076
Integrity section Flagged lines
structural 18
CPU name/tier consistency (desktop mainstream only) 0
CPU single>multi (cinebench/geekbench — should be multi>=single) 0
CPU era-vs-score outliers 8
CPU cross-source ratio outliers (possible wrong-variant) 131
GPU cross-source ratio outliers + sanity 51

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

bug Something isn't working data Dataset changes enhancement New feature or request

Projects

Status: Done

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Data accuracy: corrections, duplicates and dates (workstream)

2 participants