You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
Repository navigation
More information in scheme overviews (maybe wavelengths?) #95
It might be helpful to add a bit more information to the respective schemes in the overview. E.g. it could be the involved wavelengths in an additional column in the table, something along the lines of 350nm - 705nm - 740nm. That way it would be easier to get an initial overview, and also identify if a scheme is already registered.
I like that idea a lot. I guess this should be an additional column in the table? For low lying states, i.e., this Ti scheme, the low-lying states could be left out and just the ground state transition reported?
For that case, how about a column that states:
Ionization steps (nm):
465.8 - 416.2 - 881.4
Not too many sig figs keeps it simple, but one should still keep most schemes apart from each other? Let me know what your thoughts are!
Activity
trappitsch commentedon Sep 30, 2025
I like that idea a lot. I guess this should be an additional column in the table? For low lying states, i.e., this Ti scheme, the low-lying states could be left out and just the ground state transition reported?
For that case, how about a column that states:
Not too many sig figs keeps it simple, but one should still keep most schemes apart from each other? Let me know what your thoughts are!
Reinhard-Heinke commentedon Oct 2, 2025
Yes, a simple column entry like you show looks good to me! Nummer of sig figs looks appropriate.
For simplicity I think it's fine to omit transitions from multiple possible states. An alternative could otherwise maybe be
465.8 (469.5, 474.3) - 416.2 - 881.4
It takes a bit away from being a very quick first overview though. Then again, people might completely miss schemes that have these possibilities.