You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In some cases and for people new to the field, it might not directly be clear if a last step goes into an auto-ionizing state, or is a brute-force high photon density laser (typically 532nm Nd:YAG SHG). E.g., https://rims-code.github.io/schemes/hg/hg-002/, but also a lot more schemes employ this. It might make it easier to somehow specifically denote this last step as non-resonant, and specifically not draw a line at its end, implying an actual state.
Yes, very good point. This should in this case be:
Added to the input mask (defaults to "is ionizing transition"?)
Added as a field in the database
Automatically be added to the site if the field exists
Will be a bit of work to go through the schemes and add this, but I think for most (all?) of the schemes, we should have the knowledge to figure this out for the existing schemes.
What do you think: I can prepare a list of all schemes that exist for us to go through, and then we get together and hammer the specifications out in 30ish min?
Activity
trappitsch commentedon Sep 30, 2025
Yes, very good point. This should in this case be:
Will be a bit of work to go through the schemes and add this, but I think for most (all?) of the schemes, we should have the knowledge to figure this out for the existing schemes.
What do you think: I can prepare a list of all schemes that exist for us to go through, and then we get together and hammer the specifications out in 30ish min?