Skip to content

Prepare Node SDK 1.1.0 for the current identification contract - #15

Merged
KonstantinSerebryakov merged 3 commits into
mainfrom
codex/sdk-compat-install
Oct 28, 2026
Merged

KonstantinSerebryakov merged 3 commits into
mainfrom
codex/sdk-compat-install

Conversation

@EgorMajj

@EgorMajj EgorMajj commented Oct 27, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

The published 1.0.1 package can leave normalized identification IDs empty on the current API payload. Prepare the 1.1.0 candidate from current main with canonical identification_id and the current 20 detection flags. No npm release is performed.

Adds a synthetic current public webhook fixture and regressions for ID/raw preservation, Node/edge parsing, current flags, legacy History input, opaque production event IDs and version consistency. Production event_id can be a stable 40-character hex string; Portal Test may use a UUID. Consumers must not impose a UUID format on the event key.

Validation: 680 tests; TypeScript, ESLint/Prettier, build, package installation and Node/edge runtime checks. The previous clean React/Vite + Node/SQLite app on OrbStack completed two real History/MCP chains with matching IDs (100/Dangerous in automated Chromium). The edge candidate also verified real external deliveries from two registered production sites; browser, webhook and MCP IDs matched, both scores 30/Suspicious. Seven receiver regressions passed after correcting an erroneous UUID-only event_id check in the QA receiver; the SDK already accepted opaque IDs. A fresh native Codex OAuth login succeeded in the user's browser.

One earlier browser identification remained unavailable in History and awaits the developer's production log search. No cause is attributed to the SDK without that evidence. Public registry installation is still pending SDK publication.

@EgorMajj
EgorMajj marked this pull request as ready for review October 27, 2026 23:17
@KonstantinSerebryakov
KonstantinSerebryakov merged commit a90b5d1 into main Oct 28, 2026
4 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants