Skip to content

STAC-25565 Port the beest verification trigger to GitHub Actions - #458

Open
LouisParkin wants to merge 5 commits into
stackstate-7.78.2from
STAC-25565-beest-verification
Open

STAC-25565 Port the beest verification trigger to GitHub Actions#458
LouisParkin wants to merge 5 commits into
stackstate-7.78.2from
STAC-25565-beest-verification

Conversation

@LouisParkin

@LouisParkin LouisParkin commented Aug 10, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Ports the last unported GitLab job, beest_trigger_verification. Every other GitLab job now has a GitHub equivalent.

Manual (workflow_dispatch) only, matching the GitLab job, which was when: manual. Mints a short-lived App token scoped to actions: write on beest alone, then dispatches agent-x86.yml / arm.yml.

Pins the exact agent commit. A branch builds many images with different hashes, so sending only the branch would force every run onto whichever build is newest, with no way to verify a specific commit or reproduce a failure against the image that produced it. Defaults to this run's SHA, matching the GitLab job's CI_COMMIT_SHA. If agent_branch_under_test names a different branch, our SHA does not exist there, so the pin is left unset and beest falls back rather than dispatching a hash that resolves to nothing.

An earlier revision of this PR sent the branch only and put the SHA in the run summary, claiming beest had no hash input. That was wrong — beest's own GitLab port had dropped the input while keeping all the machinery behind it. Depends on StackVista/beest#61, which restores it; until that merges the agent_hash_under_test field will be rejected by beest.

Admin ask (blocking a live run): needs BEEST_DISPATCH_APP_CLIENT_ID (var) and BEEST_DISPATCH_APP_PRIVATE_KEY (secret) on this repo, for an App with actions: write on beest. beest's own credential is repo-level there and not reachable from here.

Base branch: stackstate-7.78.2 rather than the #444 stack. It shares no files or jobs with the build lanes and is manual-only, so it cannot affect any push/PR pipeline and need not queue behind those reviews. Trivial to retarget if preferred.

Dispatch logic tested against a mock gh across the pin default, branch-override, explicit-hash, both-suites and invalid-suite paths. actionlint and zizmor clean.

@LouisParkin

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

Blocked on an App permission, not on review. beest-bot (client Iv23liZ0K2KfycDPvXdb, the App pulumi-infra#287 wires in here) currently holds only contents: read + metadata: readno actions permission.

This workflow calls gh workflow run against StackVista/beest, which needs actions: write on that repo, and gh run list, which needs actions: read. Both will 403 today.

Order: grant beest-bot Actions read+write (org-owner UI action, no API for it) and accept the installation update → merge pulumi-infra#287 → then a live dispatch here can actually be validated. Details on #287.

@LouisParkin
LouisParkin force-pushed the STAC-25565-beest-verification branch from 44b78c2 to 346723d Compare August 17, 2026 08:47
# branch was not overridden -- against another branch our SHA means nothing,
# so leave it unset and let beest fall back.
agent_hash="${AGENT_HASH_INPUT}"
if [ -z "${agent_hash}" ] && [ -z "${AGENT_BRANCH_INPUT}" ]; then

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

[P1] Supplying agent_branch_under_test without a hash lands here with agent_hash empty. Current beest does not resolve that branch to an image; an unset hash uses the Helm chart default, so this can pass while testing the wrong agent. Please require agent_hash_under_test for an overridden branch, or resolve and validate the selected branch commit.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Confirmed and fixed in db081dc. You are right about the mechanism: helpers/resolve-agent-hashes.sh explicitly declines to resolve a branch ("Do not auto-resolve hashes. Leave unset to use Helm chart defaults when not provided"), and agent_branch_under_test only feeds RUN_ID and the Qase labels — agent-extra-values.j2.yml gates nodeAgent, clusterAgent and checksAgent tags on have_agent_tag, so an unset hash deployed chart defaults.

Took the resolve-and-validate option: a new first step resolves hash → overridden branch tip → github.sha to a concrete commit via the commits API, failing if it does not resolve. Every dispatch now carries hashes_under_test, so the unpinned path is gone.

fi

echo "dispatching ${wf}"
gh workflow run "${wf}" "${args[@]}"

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

[P2] The GitLab job was playable only after both agent and cluster-agent manifest jobs succeeded. This standalone dispatch has no equivalent gate, so it can start an expensive beest run before those images exist or after publication failed. Please fail closed until both required image publication paths for the selected SHA have completed.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Added a fail-closed gate in db081dc. Before dispatching, it requires a successful Publish and sign multi-architecture agent image and Publish and sign multi-architecture cluster-agent image for the resolved commit, walking the workflow runs for that head_sha. Both are needed because beest points clusterAgent at the cluster-agent image and nodeAgent/checksAgent at the agent image, all at the same <sha8>-<arch>.

Verified against the API: the current tip of stackstate-7.78.2 has no successful manifest job, so the gate refuses it — correctly, since the branch has been red since 13 Aug on the Go stdlib CVE gate (#461). Practical consequence: beest verification stays blocked until #461 lands, which is the intended behaviour rather than deploying images that do not exist.

# gh does not report the queued run, and every beest AWS workflow shares
# one global lock, so look the run up rather than assuming it started.
sleep 10
url="$(gh run list --repo StackVista/beest --workflow "${wf}" \

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

[P3] This selects the latest run, not necessarily the run just dispatched. API propagation delay, another dispatch, or a different ref can make the summary link an older or unrelated run. Capture the existing run IDs before dispatch and wait for a new matching workflow and ref run.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Fixed in db081dc. It now snapshots the run IDs for the workflow/ref before dispatch, then polls up to 150s for a run whose ID was not in that set, rather than taking the newest.

Tested the selection logic against stubbed run lists, including the case you describe where the newest run is pre-existing and the dispatched one appears below it — it now picks the new run. If none appears it emits a warning and links the workflow page instead of a wrong run.

LouisParkin and others added 5 commits August 18, 2026 13:44
beest_trigger_verification was the last job in the GitLab pipeline with
no GitHub Actions equivalent. Every other job is covered by the
STAC-25142 / STAC-25457 / STAC-25500 stack.

In GitLab the job sits in the postbuild stage, needs both
merge_docker_manifest jobs and is `when: manual`, passing
AGENT_BRANCH_UNDER_TEST, AGENT_HASH_UNDER_TEST and
TRIGGER_AGENT_X86_TESTS into the stackvista/integrations/beest project.

beest has since migrated to GitHub, and its agent-x86.yml and arm.yml
both expose workflow_dispatch with an agent_branch_under_test input, so
the port is a cross-repo workflow dispatch rather than a pipeline
trigger. beest resolves the agent image from the branch name, so the
commit SHA is no longer part of its input contract; it is recorded in
the run summary for traceability instead.

Keeping the workflow workflow_dispatch-only preserves the GitLab
`when: manual` semantics. These runs provision real EKS infrastructure
in the sandbox account and share a single global concurrency lock in
beest, so firing them automatically on push would queue runs behind each
other and spend hours of cluster time per merge.

The suite input defaults to x86, matching TRIGGER_AGENT_X86_TESTS: true;
arm and both are available because beest now exposes an arm workflow that
the GitLab job never reached. The scenario selector is passed through
rather than re-declared, so beest stays the single owner of the valid
scenario list.

Requires a GitHub App credential in this repo with actions:write on
StackVista/beest, provisioned via pulumi-infra:
BEEST_DISPATCH_APP_CLIENT_ID (variable) and
BEEST_DISPATCH_APP_PRIVATE_KEY (secret).

Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
The first version of this workflow sent only the branch and put the SHA in
the run summary, on the reasoning that beest had no hash input. That was
the wrong conclusion: beest's own GitLab port dropped the input while
keeping the machinery, so the missing input was a regression to fix rather
than a constraint to design around. beest#61 restores it.

A branch builds many images, so branch-only means always testing whichever
build is newest -- there is no way to verify a specific commit or to
reproduce a failure against the image that produced it.

Defaults to this run's commit, matching the GitLab job's CI_COMMIT_SHA.
When agent_branch_under_test points at some other branch our SHA does not
exist there, so the pin is left unset and beest falls back instead of
dispatching a hash that resolves to nothing.

Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
The workflow referenced BEEST_DISPATCH_APP_CLIENT_ID/PRIVATE_KEY, which are
provisioned nowhere. The beest App already exists as BEEST_GH_APP_CLIENT_ID /
BEEST_GH_APP_PRIVATE_KEY, matching the <PURPOSE>_GH_APP_* convention every other
App credential in the estate follows.

Those variables are currently bound only to the beest repo, so pulumi-infra must
also bind them to stackstate-agent before this workflow can mint a token.

Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
beest replaces agent_hash_under_test with hashes_under_test in StackVista/beest#63,
so the dispatch has to send agent=<sha> through the new field. Must land together
with that PR.

Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Review feedback on #444's follow-up: three ways the dispatch could report
success while doing the wrong thing.

Resolve the commit under test up front. beest only pins nodeAgent, clusterAgent
and checksAgent to <sha8>-<arch> when a hash reaches it, and its
resolve-agent-hashes.sh deliberately refuses to resolve a branch ("Leave unset to
use Helm chart defaults"). Passing agent_branch_under_test without a hash
therefore deployed the chart default image, so the run could pass while testing
an agent nobody selected. An overridden branch now resolves to its tip, and every
dispatch carries a concrete commit.

Require both multi-architecture manifest jobs to have succeeded for that commit
before dispatching. The GitLab job was only playable once agent and cluster-agent
had published; the standalone dispatch had no equivalent barrier and could spend a
full beest run, holding the global beest AWS lock, on images that were never
pushed.

Select the dispatched run by diffing against the runs that existed beforehand.
Taking the newest run raced with API propagation, concurrent dispatches and the
shared lock, so the summary regularly linked an unrelated run.

Needs actions:read and contents:read to resolve the commit and read its runs;
the App token stays scoped to dispatching beest.

Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
@LouisParkin
LouisParkin force-pushed the STAC-25565-beest-verification branch from db081dc to 9e83d82 Compare August 18, 2026 11:44

@LouisLotter LouisLotter left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Re-review of the current head: the concrete-SHA resolution and publication gate are addressed. Two issues remain.

args+=(--field "hashes_under_test=agent=${AGENT_HASH}")
args+=(--field "no_destroy=${NO_DESTROY}")
if [ -n "${SCENARIOS}" ]; then
args+=(--field "scenarios=${SCENARIOS}")

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

[P2] agent-x86.yml and arm.yml have disjoint scenario choices: contd-eks-x86-* versus contd-eks-arm-*. With suite=both, any non-empty architecture-specific value is forwarded to the wrong workflow, so that dispatch is rejected or constructs an invalid scenario. Please validate scenarios per suite or split the input; empty/default and all are the only shared values.

while read -r id candidate; do
case ",${before}," in
*",${id},"*) ;;
*) url="${candidate}"; break ;;

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

[P3] Snapshotting removes old runs, but the first new run is still not necessarily this dispatch: another source can enqueue the same workflow/ref after the snapshot and be selected here. The target global concurrency creates both run records before execution, so it does not remove this race. Please correlate with a dispatch marker, or collect candidates and link only when the result is unambiguous; otherwise use the workflow page. The baseline-list failure should also fail closed rather than being hidden by || true.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants