Remove non-functional CodeQL workflow - #4
Merged
Merged
Conversation
Added 2026-03-09, targeting language: csharp, but has 0 recorded runs ever (confirmed via the Actions API) and can't realistically work: this package has no .csproj/.sln, just Unity .asmdef source referencing UnityEngine APIs, which requires a licensed Unity Editor to compile -- not available to a plain CodeQL Autobuild step in CI. Removing a config that looks like coverage but has never actually run, rather than leaving it as false assurance. No SCA addition either: this is a source-only Unity package with no external dependency manifest to scan.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The existing
codeql.yml(added 2026-03-09,language: csharp) has 0 recorded runs in the Actions history and can't realistically work: no.csproj/.slnexists, just Unity.asmdefsource referencingUnityEngineAPIs, which needs a licensed Unity Editor to compile — not something a plain CodeQL Autobuild step in CI can do.Removing it rather than leaving a workflow file that looks like SAST coverage but has never once executed. No SCA addition either — this is a source-only package with no external dependency manifest to scan against.
If Unity CI ever gets a real build step (e.g. via a licensed Unity CI image), CodeQL could be revisited then.