Repository navigation
refactor(agents): clarify existing-contract autonomy and simplify role prompts - #1
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This was referenced Oct 8, 2026
Merged
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Why
GPT-6-class agents may interpret mentions of concurrency, persistence, security or contracts as automatic stop triggers, even for routine fixes that preserve approved invariants. The five role prompts also repeat generic workflow prose that the injected AGENTS.md already governs.
Changes
Luna xhigh,Sol medium/high), sandboxes, and portable workflow modes unchanged.Validation
.codex/agents/*.tomlfiles changed. No code, installation scripts or workflow policy modified.scripts-ciresult to be checked before merge.No Linear policy changes or new process steps.