Repository navigation
feat(research): add private workflow log research tooling - #4
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Add a local research protocol and dependency-free JSONL tools for investigating workflow friction. Inventories pin source hashes, compact navigation links to physical records, and evidence-sheet validation checks citation bounds, corpus totals and declared reading coverage. UTF-8 output supports redirected Windows sessions.
Raw logs, private packets and findings remain ignored. Research tooling and docs are excluded from plugin archives; shared skills and the plugin version are unchanged.
Validation obtained on this revision:
The new Python research tests were run locally; the existing hosted workflow does not invoke them.