Skip to content

fix: bump next to 16.3.3 in nextjs-app example - #1215

Merged
yogeshchoudhary147 merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
fix/next-security-patch
Aug 27, 2026
Merged

fix: bump next to 16.3.3 in nextjs-app example#1215
yogeshchoudhary147 merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
fix/next-security-patch

Conversation

@yogeshchoudhary147

@yogeshchoudhary147 yogeshchoudhary147 commented Aug 27, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary

  • Bumps next from 16.2.11 to 16.3.3 in examples/nextjs-app to address a critical (CVSS 9.8) vulnerability in the Next.js dependency.

Test plan

  • Verify npm audit no longer reports the Next.js critical vulnerability in examples/nextjs-app
  • Verify npm run build passes in examples/nextjs-app

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated the Next.js version used by the example application.
    • Includes the latest maintenance updates and improvements from the newer version.

@yogeshchoudhary147
yogeshchoudhary147 requested a review from a team as a code owner August 27, 2026 08:45
@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Aug 27, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Review Change Stack

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: 169298f7-f3dc-4565-85bc-055b393447ee

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 9bc6553 and 6d65537.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • examples/nextjs-app/package.json

Included review availability: Your plan provides up to 4 included reviews per hour; 3 remain after this review.


📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The Next.js example updates its next dependency from 16.2.11 to 16.3.3.

Changes

Next.js example update

Layer / File(s) Summary
Update Next.js dependency
examples/nextjs-app/package.json
Updates the next dependency from 16.2.11 to 16.3.3.

Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~2 minutes

Merge Risk: 🔵 Low · up to 6d655

This PR updates the example to Next.js 16.3.3, but the installed dependency source and resolved version are not independently confirmed. It is mergeable with explicit owner follow-up to verify the dependency resolution and vulnerability remediation.

Suggested reviewers: amitsingh05667

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5
✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check. Docstring coverage is scoped to functions touched by this diff. Analyzed 0 functions across 0…
Linked Issues check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check ✅ Passed The title clearly and concisely describes the dependency update in the nextjs-app example. It matches the main change in the pull request.
Full details: Docstring Coverage

Explanation

No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check. Docstring coverage is scoped to functions touched by this diff. Analyzed 0 functions across 0 files. (1 skipped: 1 unsupported.)

✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Commit unit tests in branch fix/next-security-patch

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@yogeshchoudhary147
yogeshchoudhary147 merged commit 1c6c971 into main Aug 27, 2026
19 of 20 checks passed
@yogeshchoudhary147
yogeshchoudhary147 deleted the fix/next-security-patch branch August 27, 2026 10:01
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants