Skip to content

document materialized views - #210

Merged
lukasvogel merged 1 commit into
masterfrom
vogel/matviews
Sep 28, 2026
Merged

lukasvogel merged 1 commit into
masterfrom
vogel/matviews

Conversation

@lukasvogel

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

No description provided.

@lukasvogel
lukasvogel requested review from a team and victorpacyna September 28, 2026 10:37
- `REFRESH MATERIALIZED VIEW` never blocks readers, as CedarDB uses snapshot isolation.
`CONCURRENTLY` is accepted as a synonym for a regular refresh, does not require a unique index, and can be combined with `WITH NO DATA`.
- CedarDB refuses to rename or move a table, view, or materialized view to another schema while a materialized view reads from it.
- Renaming a column of an underlying table makes the next refresh fail, since the stored query still references the old column name.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This should be blocked by dependencies and should not be reachable

Comment thread content/references/objects/materialized_views.md Outdated
Comment thread content/references/objects/materialized_views.md Outdated
@lukasvogel
lukasvogel merged commit 6d52d42 into master Sep 28, 2026
3 of 4 checks passed
@lukasvogel
lukasvogel deleted the vogel/matviews branch September 28, 2026 15:07
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants