Skip to content

docs: remove Go Report Card badge from README - #3393

Closed
migmartri wants to merge 1 commit into
chainloop-dev:mainfrom
migmartri:devel/remove-goreport-badge
Closed

migmartri wants to merge 1 commit into
chainloop-dev:mainfrom
migmartri:devel/remove-goreport-badge

Conversation

@migmartri

@migmartri migmartri commented Sep 1, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Removes the Go Report Card badge from the README badge row.

Assisted by Claude Code.

Review in cubic

Assisted-by: Claude Code
Signed-off-by: Miguel Martinez Trivino <miguel@chainloop.dev>

Chainloop-Trace-Sessions: bfe1f546-1c54-4abe-ac69-f569d5cd563a
@chainloop-platform

chainloop-platform Bot commented Sep 1, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

AI Session Checks — 🟡 60% · ✅ 0 failing

Avg score Sessions Failing policies Attribution Files Lines Total Duration
🟡 60% 1 ✅ 0 100% AI / 0% Human 1 +0 / -1 1m1s

🟡 60% — 100% AI — ✅ All policies passing

Sep 1, 2026 10:32 UTC · 1m1s · $0.52 · 26 in / 2.1k out · claude-code 2.1.251 (claude-opus-5)

View session details ↗

Change Summary

  • Removes the Go Report Card badge line from README.md.
  • Creates a dedicated branch and signed commit for the README-only change.
  • Attempts to push the branch, but the session shows no PR URL or completed PR creation step.

AI Session Overall Score

🟡 60% — Focused README change, but the requested PR was never shown as created.

AI Session Analysis Breakdown

🟢 97% · scope-discipline

🟢 The observed edit stayed to one README line. · High Impact

🟢 92% · context-and-planning

🟢 The user named the exact file and badge upfront. · High Impact

🟢 90% · user-trust-signal

🟢 The user moved straight to shipping without corrections. · Medium Impact

🔴 38% · alignment

🔴 User asked for a PR, but the session only shows branch, commit, and push attempts. · High Severity

💡 When asked to create a PR, do not stop at pushing a branch; show the PR URL or the blocker.

abstained · solution-quality

No notes.

abstained · verification

🟡 Verification and solution-quality abstained because the observed change is a docs-only README edit. · Low Severity


File Attribution

████████████████████ 100% AI / 0% Human

Status Attribution File Lines
modified ai README.md +0 / -1

Policies (4)

Status Policy Material Messages
✅ Passed ai-config-ai-agents-allowed ai-coding-session-bfe1f5 -
✅ Passed ai-config-no-dangerous-commands ai-coding-session-bfe1f5 -
✅ Passed ai-config-no-secrets ai-coding-session-bfe1f5 -
✅ Passed ai-config-mcp-servers-allowed ai-coding-session-bfe1f5 -

Security Checks — ⚠️ 1 failing

✅ secret-scan

Status Policy Messages
✅ Passed secrets-detection -

✅ sast-scan

Status Policy Messages
✅ Passed owasp-top10-2025 -
✅ Passed sast -
✅ Passed cwe-top25 -
✅ Passed cwe-top26-40-cusp -

PR info

Status Policy Messages
✅ Passed pr-description-required -
⚠️ Failed pr-user-story-linked PR/MR #3393 does not reference a user story or issue in title, description, or branch 'docs: remove Go Report Card badge from README'. Expected patterns: ["(?i)[A-Z]+-[0-9]+", "#[0-9]+", "(?i)[A-Z]{2", "}-[0-9]+", "(?i)gh-[0-9]+", "(?i)\[[A-Z]+-[0-9]+\]"]

⏭️ 3 scans not applied

Scan Reason
vulnerability-scan no manifest/lockfile changed
github-actions-scan no workflow files changed
iac-scan no IaC files changed

View attestation ↗


Powered by Chainloop and Chainloop Trace

@cubic-dev-ai cubic-dev-ai Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

No issues found across 1 file

Heads up: you’re close to your included review allowance. Set a flex budget so reviews don’t pause.

Re-trigger cubic

@migmartri migmartri closed this Sep 1, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant