Repository navigation
Record master as merged into v7 (no file changes) - #125
Merged
Merged
Conversation
* Add v7 'AI native' design doc Proposes how v7 changes configuration, message registration, handlers, testing, errors, observability, contracts, packaging and docs so AI coding agents (and people) can use Obvs correctly first time. Each change links to its tracking issue in the v7 milestone (#84-#95). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * Design doc: frame the async APIs as layers over the observable core Section 4 now explains why v7 stays observable-first: handlers, RequestAsync and IAsyncEnumerable are thin adapters over IObservable, Rx stays first class for stream composition, and analyzer OBVS006 catches Subscribe(async). Resolves the open question on Rx: it stays in the core package. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * Design doc: describe the bus lifetime under dependency injection Section 1 now covers how the singleton bus is registered and owned, scoped handlers, repeated AddObvs calls, keyed buses, and why one bus per container needs a per-bus instance ID in broker-side names instead of the process ID used by v6. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
MessageSource started its receive loop with Task.Run. The loop blocks for as long as the subscription lasts, so each subscription held a thread-pool thread, and Subscribe waited until the loop got one. On CI's small runners, the NetMQ tests start a dozen subscriptions at once; the pool added threads slowly, subscribers took over 5 seconds to connect, publishers stopped waiting for them, and the first messages were dropped. The loop now runs as a LongRunning task on a dedicated thread. TestMessageSourceThreading saturates the thread pool and checks that subscribing doesn't wait for it. It failed before this change. Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
…hread (#113) MessageSource passed each message to subscribers synchronously on RabbitMQ.Client's consumer-dispatch thread. Code running after a message arrived, including code after awaiting one (the continuation runs inline there), could deadlock it: disposing the bus closes the connection, which waits for that same thread. Messages are still deserialized on the dispatch thread, while the body's buffer is valid, then handed to subscribers on the task pool, in order. TestServiceBus.ShouldNotDeadlockWhenASubscriberDisposesTheBus disposes the bus from a message callback; it timed out before this change. Backport of the fix in v7 PR #112. Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Microsoft's download origin returns 409 for the new SDK 10.0.403 and runtime 10.0.14, so setup-dotnet fails to install 10.0.x. Go back to 10.0.x once that release downloads. Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
MessageSource called observer.OnNext on its consume thread, the task started by Task.Run in Messages. Disposing the subscription cancels the token and then waits for that task, so a subscriber that disposed the bus or its subscription from a message callback waited on itself forever. Messages are now handed to subscribers on the task pool, in order. TestMessageSendAndReceive.ShouldNotDeadlockWhenASubscriberDisposesItsSubscription disposes the subscription from a message callback; the message arrived but the dispose timed out before this change. Backport of the fix in v7 PR #119; the same fix for RabbitMQ was #113. Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
…thread (#122) MessageSource passed each message to subscribers synchronously on the NMS session's dispatch thread. Code that ran after awaiting a message could then run on that thread, and deadlock it by disposing the bus: stopping the connection waits for the dispatch thread, forever. NMS skips that wait only for code in the dispatch's own execution context, which an await continuation isn't. Messages are now handed to subscribers on the task pool, in order. TestServiceBus.ShouldNotDeadlockWhenCodeAfterAwaitingAMessageDisposesTheBus hung before this change. Five TestMessageSource tests now wait for delivery instead of expecting it on the listener's thread. CI runs the ActiveMQ broker tests against apache/activemq-classic. Backport of the fix in v7 PR #121. Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Records master's commits up to c0ff537 as merged, without changing any files. Their content is already on v7: #124 brought it in, but was squash-merged, so git still treated them as unmerged and the next master merge would have repeated its conflicts. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
christopherread
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 26, 2026
GitVersion 6's Mainline strategy throws "Cannot find the base commit of merged branch" on f3fc238, the merge commit #125 added to v7, so CI failed at Determine Version on v7 and every branch from it. Ignoring that commit lets it calculate a version again. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
#124 brought
master's content intov7, but it was squash-merged, so its commit has one parent. Git therefore still treatedmaster's 6 commits as unmerged:The next master merge would have repeated #124's four conflicts.
This PR is a single merge commit made with
git merge -s ours origin/master.v7andmaster's tipc0ff537.v7is empty.git rev-list origin/v7..origin/mastercomes back empty. The nextmastermerge then only brings in commits made after this one.🤖 Generated with Claude Code