Skip to content

docs: establish domain vocabulary and identity scenarios (#5) - #6

Draft
codeonym wants to merge 2 commits into
mainfrom
docs/5-domain-model
Draft

codeonym wants to merge 2 commits into
mainfrom
docs/5-domain-model

Conversation

@codeonym

@codeonym codeonym commented Oct 15, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary

Medora now has a shared domain vocabulary and a stack-neutral relationship model grounded in the confirmed product foundation. The first modeling round establishes Staff Account versus Practice Membership, shared Contact Points and requests that survive reservation expiry.

GLOSSARY.md            resolved definitions only
docs/domain-model.md   accepted relationships and open scenarios
.planning/decisions/   exact replies, interpretation and dependencies

Refs #5. Domain modeling remains active. The next questions concern active reservation limits, appointment continuity during rescheduling and receptionist coverage. These remain proposals; detailed booking and access follow-ups are still in progress. No stack, schema or application implementation is selected.

Evidence

  • Before: product scope existed without a canonical glossary or domain relationship model.
  • After: vocabulary and accepted relationships have linked decision records; the joint reply is preserved verbatim, separately from its interpretation. Unanswered scenarios remain explicit. Repository/link, planning metadata and staged whitespace checks pass.

Merge Danger

Door: two-way

Documentation and terminology only; the modeling session remains open and this PR stays draft.

Blast Radius: planning

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant