Skip to content

chore(sync): reconcile docs - #2

Merged
codus-async merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
feat/coding-standards-tooling
Oct 10, 2026
Merged

codus-async merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
feat/coding-standards-tooling

Conversation

@codus-async

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

No description provided.

@chatgpt-codex-connector

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot commented Oct 10, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review Status Commit Review trigger
📝 Code Review ✅ Completed 2026-10-10T12:10:07.814356Z 777fdc7 PR opened
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Oct 10, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Important

  • 🔍 Trigger review

This repository does not receive automatic reviews because it has fewer than 10 stars.

⚙️ Run configuration
  • Configuration used: defaults
  • Review profile: CHILL
  • Plan: Advanced
  • Run ID: 055ea071-66f4-422c-b88c-307872e6fa25

  • Autofix · Keep fixing CodeRabbit findings and required CI, and resolving merge conflicts

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@codus-async
codus-async merged commit 562fdbf into main Oct 10, 2026
2 checks passed
@codus-async
codus-async deleted the feat/coding-standards-tooling branch October 10, 2026 12:07

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 777fdc7df0

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

}
```

**Before every commit, run `nr lint --fix` to format, then `nr ci` and make sure it passes.** Do not commit with a failing `ci`; fix the root cause instead of silencing rules or adding ignores.

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P2 Badge Use the repository's npm verification gate

When this listed tooling skill is followed before a commit, nr ci targets a ci script that does not exist in the root or either app manifest, so it cannot run the repository's actual checks (npm run verify). Replace this directive with the npm-based commands already configured for this repo rather than prescribing the pnpm/nr workflow.

AGENTS.md reference: AGENTS.md:L8-L8

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.


**(You MUST use typescript-eslint v8+ with `projectService: true` for typed linting)**

**(You MUST include eslint-plugin-only-warn to convert errors to warnings for better DX)**

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P2 Badge Do not turn lint failures into warnings

If this skill is used to update either ESLint configuration, making eslint-plugin-only-warn mandatory converts lint errors into warnings, while the repository runs eslint . without --max-warnings; as eslint --help documents, that option is what makes warnings trigger a nonzero exit (default -1). Consequently, the configured pre-commit and CI lint gates can pass with violations instead of blocking them.

AGENTS.md reference: AGENTS.md:L56-L58

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant