Skip to content

release: 0.3.0 - #155

Merged
devjiwonchoi merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
release/0.3.0
Sep 9, 2026
Merged

devjiwonchoi merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
release/0.3.0

Conversation

@devjiwonchoi

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

why?

First tagged prerelease of the revived client, plus two loose ends: the version still read 1.0.0-alpha.0, and the README pointed endpoint discovery at the Lichess docs page (organized by URL path) which does not list the generated function names.

how?

  • Bump version to 0.3.0 (prerelease line).
  • Rewrite the API-reference section: functions are named from the spec operationId; discover them via editor autocomplete + hover JSDoc; src/client/sdk.gen.ts is the full function index.
  • Add .github/workflows/publish.yml — publishes to npm on GitHub Release (published) with provenance (--tag next). Requires an NPM_TOKEN secret.

@chatgpt-codex-connector

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot commented Sep 9, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review Status Commit Review trigger
📝 Code Review ✅ Completed 2026-09-09T21:16:21.886898Z 6dfc3f9 Manual request
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: d5aa5226c1

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

Comment thread .github/workflows/publish.yml Outdated
run: pnpm build

- name: Publish to npm
run: pnpm publish --no-git-checks --provenance --access public --tag next

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P1 Badge Document the next tag used for this prerelease

This publishes 0.3.0 only under the next dist-tag, while README.md still tells users to run pnpm add equine. The npm dist-tag documentation states that an unqualified install selects latest, so users following the README will receive the previous 0.2.1 client, whose API exports only Equine, and the documented accountMe/setToken imports will fail. Either publish this release under latest or change the installation command to pnpm add equine@next.

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

- Bump version to 0.3.0 (first prerelease of the revived client).
- README: rewrite the API-reference section so endpoint discovery is
  actually usable — the Lichess docs are organized by URL path, not function
  name, so point to editor autocomplete + hover JSDoc, the operationId->name
  mapping, and src/client/sdk.gen.ts as the function index.
- Add .github/workflows/publish.yml: publish to npm on GitHub Release
  (published), with provenance; needs an NPM_TOKEN secret.
@devjiwonchoi

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner Author

Resolved in 6dfc3f9: dropped --tag next, so 0.3.0 publishes to latest. pnpm add equine will install 0.3.0 (the revived client, matching the README). The prior 1.0.0-alpha.0 was a mistaken version; 0.3.0 becomes the current latest (npm allows moving latest since dist-tags are set explicitly on publish).

@devjiwonchoi

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner Author

@codex review

@chatgpt-codex-connector

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. Another round soon, please!

Reviewed commit: 6dfc3f924c

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

@devjiwonchoi
devjiwonchoi merged commit 89d5a1f into main Sep 9, 2026
2 checks passed
@devjiwonchoi
devjiwonchoi deleted the release/0.3.0 branch September 9, 2026 21:19
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant