Table datatest with JUnit by TruongQuangSB · Pull Request #2693 · eclipse-set/set

TruongQuangSB · 2026-09-23T14:05:10Z

No description provided.

github-actions · 2026-09-23T14:10:59Z

Test Results

202 tests +19 190 ✅ + 7 3m 19s ⏱️ -55s
5 suites - 37 0 💤 ± 0
5 files - 37 12 ❌ +12

For more details on these failures, see this check.

Results for commit cce7665. ± Comparison against base commit ae5f1af.

This pull request removes 184 and adds 201 tests. Note that renamed tests count towards both.

, 2
, a  b c
TableExtensionsTest CompareFootnoteContainer ‑ One single footnote container with unchanged, new and old footnote
TableExtensionsTest CompareTableFootnoteContainer ‑ simple compare planning with one removed and one new footnote
TableExtensionsTest Mix of footnote container types ‑ combined simple and compare footnote containers
TableExtensionsTest Mix of footnote container types ‑ footnote not changed in compare planning
TableExtensionsTest Mix of footnote container types ‑ footnote removed in one container of compare planning but still used in another
TableExtensionsTest Mix of footnote container types ‑ footnotes with overlaps between start-/zielzustand and change in compare planning
TableExtensionsTest SimpleFootnoteContainer ‑ One single footnote container
TableExtensionsTest Special cases ‑ Footnote with no Bearbeitungsvermerk
…

org.eclipse.set.feature.table.pt1.test.Pt1TableTransformationTest ‑ testExistTableTransformService
org.eclipse.set.feature.table.pt1.test.Pt1TableTransformationTest ‑ testTransformator(String)[1] /tmp/set-test12917182144691859832PPHN_1.10.0.3_01-02_Ibn-Z._-_2._AeM_2022-05-17_13-44_tg3.planpro
org.eclipse.set.feature.table.pt1.test.Pt1TableTransformationTest ‑ testTransformator(String)[2] /tmp/set-test5959857214707680157Info__2026-04-21_10-40.planpro
org.eclipse.set.feature.table.pt1.test.tabledata.Pt1TableControlAreaDataTest ‑ testExistTableTransformService
org.eclipse.set.feature.table.pt1.test.tabledata.Pt1TableControlAreaDataTest ‑ testTableControlAreaData(String, PtTable) ESTW-A Linksdorf - ssbb
org.eclipse.set.feature.table.pt1.test.tabledata.Pt1TableControlAreaDataTest ‑ testTableControlAreaData(String, PtTable) ESTW-A Linksdorf - ssit
org.eclipse.set.feature.table.pt1.test.tabledata.Pt1TableControlAreaDataTest ‑ testTableControlAreaData(String, PtTable) ESTW-A Linksdorf - sska
org.eclipse.set.feature.table.pt1.test.tabledata.Pt1TableControlAreaDataTest ‑ testTableControlAreaData(String, PtTable) ESTW-A Linksdorf - sskf
org.eclipse.set.feature.table.pt1.test.tabledata.Pt1TableControlAreaDataTest ‑ testTableControlAreaData(String, PtTable) ESTW-A Linksdorf - sskg
org.eclipse.set.feature.table.pt1.test.tabledata.Pt1TableControlAreaDataTest ‑ testTableControlAreaData(String, PtTable) ESTW-A Linksdorf - ssko
…

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

TruongQuangSB · 2026-09-24T09:37:22Z

@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+Lfd. Nr.;A;B;C;D;E;F;G;H;I;J;K;L;M;N;O;P;Q;R


we don't the table header here, the header rendere was tested with XSL

mariusheine · 2026-10-19T19:29:58Z

@TruongQuangSB Can we run these tests in a separate CI job e.g. "integration-tests". This way it is easier to differentiate between "old" unit tests and the migrated swt bot tests. And are the csv references the same as the one from SWT-Bot?

And why did you kept SWTBot-Test here? They should be obsolete now at least in my understanding.

TruongQuangSB · 2026-10-20T09:41:43Z

@TruongQuangSB Can we run these tests in a separate CI job e.g. "integration-tests". This way it is easier to differentiate between "old" unit tests and the migrated swt bot tests. And are the csv references the same as the one from SWT-Bot?

And why did you kept SWTBot-Test here? They should be obsolete now at least in my understanding.

a separate CI job is good idea.
The csv-reference here isn't complete same as SWTBot. This csv isn't contains HTML-Text, it is normal text, no richtext
I keep the SWTBot for now, because in this PR the create-difference-table-view isn't implement

mariusheine · 2026-10-20T22:11:49Z

@TruongQuangSB Can we run these tests in a separate CI job e.g. "integration-tests". This way it is easier to differentiate between "old" unit tests and the migrated swt bot tests. And are the csv references the same as the one from SWT-Bot?
And why did you kept SWTBot-Test here? They should be obsolete now at least in my understanding.

a separate CI job is good idea.

Perfect

The csv-reference here isn't complete same as SWTBot. This csv isn't contains HTML-Text, it is normal text, no richtext

And how do we compare red/yellow differences?

I keep the SWTBot for now, because in this PR the create-difference-table-view isn't implement

ahh yes. Good point!

…-set/set into test-tabledata-with-osgi

TruongQuangSB · 2026-10-29T08:48:14Z

@mariusheine the Osgi-test are now in test.yml workflow

TruongQuangSB · 2026-10-30T14:40:28Z

@mariusheine before you merge this PR, you should see this #2843

mariusheine · 2026-11-11T07:25:26Z

@mariusheine before you merge this PR, you should see this #2843

And which one should we merge first now? 😆

TruongQuangSB · 2026-11-11T09:18:19Z

@mariusheine before you merge this PR, you should see this #2843

And which one should we merge first now? 😆

@mariusheine you should merge #2843 first. This will be merge to this PR not to main

TruongQuangSB added 2 commits September 15, 2026 17:43

test

c2c0aa6

Table Data test with junit

2b45d8c

fix missing Eclipse SWT Widger

8253c77

TruongQuangSB commented Sep 24, 2026

View reviewed changes

TruongQuangSB added 2 commits September 24, 2026 11:38

Update TableServiceImpl.java

ef0f3e7

update test exsits table transform service

45239b2

This comment has been minimized.

Sign in to view

TruongQuangSB marked this pull request as ready for review September 25, 2026 09:49

TruongQuangSB added 2 commits September 28, 2026 10:25

inital

3b48d3f

Update

0ef3b21

This comment has been minimized.

Sign in to view

TruongQuangSB and others added 9 commits October 8, 2026 13:27

add fail message

1d2d301

fix

6d2217c

update test fail messages

bc249ce

update

6c4beb1

update test

bc3b9dd

Merge branch 'main' into test-tabledata-with-osgi

812bcf6

update

0fbb8ba

Clear storage data after test

ef1171e

wait auf geometry service

04b6d1b

TruongQuangSB added 2 commits October 28, 2026 11:04

move osgi test to own directory and workflow

f72d2ea

Update test workflow

643d913

This comment has been minimized.

Sign in to view

fix missing root file

06961ce

This comment has been minimized.

Sign in to view

update

4d82aef

This comment has been minimized.

Sign in to view

Update test.yml

b53ae0d

This comment has been minimized.

Sign in to view

TruongQuangSB and others added 2 commits October 28, 2026 15:23

Merge branch 'main' into test-tabledata-with-osgi

d3497d8

Update ci.yml

721ea26

This comment has been minimized.

Sign in to view

TruongQuangSB added 3 commits October 28, 2026 16:59

update reference file

973b57e

Merge branch 'test-tabledata-with-osgi' of https://github.com/eclipse…

4f5091e

…-set/set into test-tabledata-with-osgi

Update

6e23146

Merge branch 'main' into test-tabledata-with-osgi

2728f7b

This comment has been minimized.

Sign in to view

update pom version

cce7665

TruongQuangSB mentioned this pull request Nov 5, 2026

Osgi test plazmode validation #2850

Open

		@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
		Lfd. Nr.;A;B;C;D;E;F;G;H;I;J;K;L;M;N;O;P;Q;R

Conversation

TruongQuangSB commented Sep 23, 2026

Uh oh!

github-actions Bot commented Sep 23, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Test Results

Uh oh!

TruongQuangSB Sep 24, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

This comment has been minimized.

This comment has been minimized.

mariusheine commented Oct 19, 2026

Uh oh!

TruongQuangSB commented Oct 20, 2026

Uh oh!

mariusheine commented Oct 20, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

This comment has been minimized.

This comment has been minimized.

This comment has been minimized.

This comment has been minimized.

This comment has been minimized.

TruongQuangSB commented Oct 29, 2026

Uh oh!

TruongQuangSB commented Oct 30, 2026

Uh oh!

This comment has been minimized.

mariusheine commented Nov 11, 2026

Uh oh!

TruongQuangSB commented Nov 11, 2026

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Uh oh!

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

2 participants

github-actions Bot commented Sep 23, 2026 •

edited

Loading

mariusheine commented Oct 20, 2026 •

edited

Loading