AI in Metascience: publish the provisional programme - #876
Open
LukasWallrich wants to merge 12 commits into
Open
AI in Metascience: publish the provisional programme#876LukasWallrich wants to merge 12 commits into
LukasWallrich wants to merge 12 commits into
Conversation
Replaces the "programme coming in early September" placeholder with the sessions and the talks in each, in running order. No clock times and no abstracts: presenter availability was never collected, so every slot is still being confirmed with the authors. One reply moves everything after it in its session, and a day plus morning or afternoon is what a reader in another time zone needs in order to decide. Times and abstracts follow on 10 September. The block between the PROGRAMME markers is generated by build/public_programme.py in the submission-review repo, which reads the same submission records the committee decided on. Rerun it to refresh the block. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Contributor
|
👍 All image files/references (if any) are in webp format, in line with our policy. |
Contributor
📝 Spell Check ResultsFound 7 potential spelling issue(s) when checking 9 changed file(s): 📄
|
| Line | Issue |
|---|---|
| 291 | Harware ==> Hardware |
| 291 | nWe ==> new |
| 291 | nIn ==> inn, min, bin, nine |
| 291 | nWe ==> new |
| 291 | nWe ==> new |
| 291 | nWe ==> new |
| 291 | nWe ==> new |
ℹ️ How to address these issues:
- Fix the typo: If it's a genuine typo, please correct it.
- Add to whitelist: If it's a valid word (e.g., a name, technical term), add it to
.codespell-ignore.txt - False positive: If this is a false positive, please report it in the PR comments.
🤖 This check was performed by codespell
…ading Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Contributor
Author
|
✅ Staging Deployment Status This PR has been successfully deployed to staging as part of an aggregated deployment. Deployed at: 2026-09-02 22:22:19 UTC The staging site shows the combined state of all compatible open PRs. |
Every talk row opens its abstract in a modal, so the page carries the full content rather than a list of titles. The abstracts come from the same submission records the committee decided on. Layout, after a design pass: - Session headings now outweigh talk titles, so the page can be read by session rather than talk by talk. - Vertical rhythm separates day, half-day and session instead of running them together. - A chevron on each row says it opens something; hovering no longer shifts the text sideways. - Rows are at least 44px tall, the half-day label meets contrast, and a long abstract scrolls inside the dialog instead of running off a phone screen. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
…mitted ones Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
…at TalTech Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
…Tuesday Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
…ternoon Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
richarddushime
approved these changes
Sep 1, 2026
richarddushime
left a comment
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Aprouving checks so that you can merge it anytime
…iew and programme The generated programme block is styled with CSS only, so the build script in the submission-review repo needs no change. Talk titles use the site link colour to show they open the abstract. Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01CgrBfhmD8tnz31EGkzbmMR
Almarzouq, Helmy and Yamada rewrote their abstracts after the committee asked for more detail; Helmy's talk is retitled "The FOCUS Framework: Ten Simple Rules...". Peder Isager is at Oslo New University College. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Adds the programme to
/ai-metascience/, replacing the "full programme will be available here in early September" placeholder.Intended to merge on 2 September, which is the date the registration announcement gave. Holding it until then leaves room to absorb any further withdrawals.
What is on the page
Day, half-day, session, talk title, speaker. 32 accepted submissions plus the two invited talks, in running order. Clicking a talk opens its abstract in a modal.
What is deliberately not on it
No clock times. Presenter availability was never collected, so every slot is inferred from a submitted time zone and is still being confirmed. One reply moves everything after it in its session. Day plus morning or afternoon is what a reader in another time zone needs in order to decide whether to register. Times land on 10 September, as the page says.
How the block is maintained
Everything between
<!-- PROGRAMME:START -->and<!-- PROGRAMME:END -->is generated bybuild/public_programme.pyin the (private) submission-review repo, from the same records the committee decided on. It refuses to build unless every accepted submission appears exactly once, so the page cannot drift from the decisions. Rerunning it on 10 September replaces the block in place.Everything outside the markers — the CSS and the section intro — is hand-written and safe to edit here.
Notes
🤖 Generated with Claude Code