Skip to content

feat: run observed project-local ESLint before WASM precheck - #11

Merged
loong10k merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
feat/rust-hook-prompt-guidance
Sep 29, 2026
Merged

loong10k merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
feat/rust-hook-prompt-guidance

Conversation

@loong10k

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

For single-file lint typescript in the opt-in WASM build, a project-local ESLint 10 package plus exactly one ordinary flat config now takes the native path when an executable Node is available on PATH. The CLI fills the local entry, version and working directory, then reuses the existing bounded native version/report probe. A native finding is retained; a version mismatch remains incomplete and never falls back to a clean WASM result. When Node is unresolved, the local candidate remains a setup action; when no local entry exists, candidate syntax precheck remains available.

This is partial OpenSpec S14.5/S14.6 progress, not project-wide native-first routing or delivery approval. The native end-to-end test uses a controlled process fixture; real ESLint 10 and project script equivalence remain unverified.

Validation: 17 targeted tests passed, 4 existing real-Node/ESLint tests ignored; default-feature ESLint tests 6 passed/4 ignored; feature Clippy -D warnings, fmt, layering, OpenSpec strict and diff checks passed. English and Chinese command/technical docs were updated.

@chatgpt-codex-connector

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot commented Sep 29, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review Status Commit Review trigger
📝 Code Review ✅ Completed 2026-09-29T04:57:44.654429Z 9c08939 PR opened
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

@loong10k
loong10k merged commit 169ed45 into main Sep 29, 2026
1 check passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant