Repository navigation
Pin four more CodeGraph grammar candidates and expose Dart loader gap - #25
Merged
Merged
Conversation
Codex Review SummaryThis comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHubYour team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
CodeGuard now pins the R, Ruby, full PHP, and Kotlin grammars from the CodeGraph source inventory. Each candidate has fixed upstream provenance, license and byte hashes, measured Rust ABI, and isolated positive/negative parser smoke tests. The read-only coverage report now shows 22/32 candidates and explicitly identifies Dart's external-scanner import as a Rust worker gap; it still reports zero released syntax capabilities.
The English and Chinese architecture, technical design, README and existing OpenSpec task record distinguish these limited candidates from qualified lint support.
Validation:
cargo test --locked --workspace --all-features(182 groups, 1142 passed, 0 failed, 106 ignored), all-target Clippy with warnings denied, fmt, Draft 2020-12 manifest validation, OpenSpec strict validation, and actualgrammar statusoutput (32 source / 22 candidate / 0 released, exit 3). The ignored native-tool cases do not count as language acceptance.