Repository navigation
Expose CodeGraph WASM coverage and explicit integration gaps - #8
Merged
Merged
Conversation
Codex Review SummaryThis comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHubYour team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
CodeGuard only bundles unqualified Java and TypeScript grammar candidates, while its CodeGraph source maps 32 distinct WASM grammars. Add a pinned source coverage inventory and
codeguard grammar statusso maintainers can see exactly which assets are candidates, not integrated, or still provided by an unpinned dependency. The command is read-only and always reportsnot_evaluated; it does not load a parser or weaken native lint obligations.This also surfaces the COBOL asset's size incompatibility with the current 8 MiB Rust loader limit. Update OpenSpec and English/Chinese docs without marking S14 complete.
Validation: 30/30 vendored assets rehashed from the pinned CodeGraph commit; 2/2 CLI contract tests;
cargo clippy -p codeguard-cli --all-targets -- -D warnings;cargo fmt --all --check;python3 scripts/check_layering.py;openspec validate introduce-rust-codeguard-cli --strict.