Skip to content

fix: describe the windows name rule we actually apply (BR-2245) - #61

Merged
victor-ferro merged 3 commits into
masterfrom
fix/BR-2245-invalid-windows-name-message
Sep 10, 2026
Merged

victor-ferro merged 3 commits into
masterfrom
fix/BR-2245-invalid-windows-name-message

Conversation

@victor-ferro

@victor-ferro victor-ferro commented Sep 10, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

The message we show when an item is skipped no longer matches the rule we apply.

internxt/drive-desktop#1493 changed which names Windows can actually address: a leading
space is reachable and is now accepted, while a name ending in a dot is not and
is now rejected. The message still says names cannot start or end with spaces,
and never mentions the dot — so a user whose folder was skipped is given the
wrong reason.

Updated in en, es, fr and de. The character list is unchanged: it already
matched what we reject.

Two smaller changes ride along:

  • Bumps the version to 1.0.1, so drive-desktop pulls a new tarball name instead
    of reusing the cached 1.0.0 with different contents.
  • Ignores the tarball npm pack leaves in the working tree, which is what makes
    the submodule show up as modified without anyone touching it.

@victor-ferro victor-ferro self-assigned this Sep 10, 2026
@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Coverage Report

Status Category Percentage Covered / Total
🔵 Lines 81.57% 248 / 304
🔵 Statements 83.09% 285 / 343
🔵 Functions 88.37% 76 / 86
🔵 Branches 71.07% 86 / 121
File CoverageNo changed files found.
Generated in workflow #277 for commit 2fc08f7 by the Vitest Coverage Report Action

@victor-ferro
victor-ferro merged commit d920c97 into master Sep 10, 2026
4 checks passed
@victor-ferro
victor-ferro deleted the fix/BR-2245-invalid-windows-name-message branch September 10, 2026 09:51
AlexisMora pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 10, 2026
* fix: describe the windows name rule we actually apply (BR-2245)

* chore: ignore the tarball npm pack leaves behind

* chore: bump version to 1.0.1
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants