Skip to content

Remove raw validation data from the repository - #119

Merged
codegeek merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
chore/remove-raw-validation-data
Oct 27, 2026
Merged

codegeek merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
chore/remove-raw-validation-data

Conversation

@codegeek

@codegeek codegeek commented Oct 27, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Why

Raw validation information must not be part of the project: validation records keep summarized results, conditions and reproduction commands, and raw run output stays outside the repository.

Changes

  • Delete specs/014-capability-plugin-spi/validation/pr-102/raw/ (69 files: per-run load-test output, fan-out A/A summaries, power/load logs, irctest case lists and the one-off aa-analysis.py, which scripts/fanout-aa.py in Make CapabilityFanoutLoadTest precise enough to judge a 10% regression #118 supersedes).
  • Remove the 8 links to those files from pr-102/performance.md and pr-102/irctest.md; the summarized results, tables and hashes stay.

No code changes. git ls-files specs now lists only Markdown.

The open PR #118 also edits pr-102/performance.md (different sections) and no longer adds raw files; whichever merges second gets rebased.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

Summary by Sourcery

Keep validation records limited to summarized results by removing raw run outputs and their documentation references.

Enhancements:

  • Remove raw validation artifacts from the repository while preserving summarized validation results and metadata.
  • Update validation documentation to omit links and references to removed raw outputs.

@sourcery-ai

sourcery-ai Bot commented Oct 27, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Reviewer's guide (collapsed on small PRs)

Reviewer's Guide

This documentation-only cleanup removes raw validation outputs and their references from PR-102, leaving the summarized, reproducible validation evidence in Markdown and ensuring tracked specs contain only Markdown content.

File-Level Changes

Change Details Files
Remove all raw validation artifacts while retaining summarized validation evidence.
  • Delete the 69-file raw validation directory, including load-test output, fan-out logs, power logs, irctest case lists, and the superseded analysis script.
  • Remove eight Markdown links that referenced deleted raw artifacts.
  • Preserve summarized results, tables, conditions, reproduction commands, and hashes in the validation records.
specs/014-capability-plugin-spi/validation/pr-102/raw/aa-analysis.py
specs/014-capability-plugin-spi/validation/pr-102/raw/*.txt
specs/014-capability-plugin-spi/validation/pr-102/raw/*.tsv
specs/014-capability-plugin-spi/validation/pr-102/performance.md
specs/014-capability-plugin-spi/validation/pr-102/irctest.md

Tips and commands

Interacting with Sourcery

  • Trigger a new review: Comment @sourcery-ai review on the pull request.
  • Continue discussions: Reply directly to Sourcery's review comments.
  • Generate a GitHub issue from a review comment: Ask Sourcery to create an
    issue from a review comment by replying to it. You can also reply to a
    review comment with @sourcery-ai issue to create an issue from it.
  • Generate a pull request title: Write @sourcery-ai anywhere in the pull
    request title to generate a title at any time. You can also comment
    @sourcery-ai title on the pull request to (re-)generate the title at any time.
  • Generate a pull request summary: Write @sourcery-ai summary anywhere in
    the pull request body to generate a PR summary at any time exactly where you
    want it. You can also comment @sourcery-ai summary on the pull request to
    (re-)generate the summary at any time.
  • Generate reviewer's guide: Comment @sourcery-ai guide on the pull
    request to (re-)generate the reviewer's guide at any time.
  • Resolve all Sourcery comments: Comment @sourcery-ai resolve on the
    pull request to resolve all Sourcery comments. Useful if you've already
    addressed all the comments and don't want to see them anymore.
  • Dismiss all Sourcery reviews: Comment @sourcery-ai dismiss on the pull
    request to dismiss all existing Sourcery reviews. Especially useful if you
    want to start fresh with a new review - don't forget to comment
    @sourcery-ai review to trigger a new review!

Customizing Your Experience

Access your dashboard to:

  • Enable or disable review features such as the Sourcery-generated pull request
    summary, the reviewer's guide, and others.
  • Change the review language.
  • Add, remove or edit custom review instructions.
  • Adjust other review settings.

Getting Help

@sourcery-ai sourcery-ai Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hey - I've reviewed your changes and they look great!


Sourcery is free for open source - if you like our reviews please consider sharing them ✨

Validation records keep their summarized results (tables, conditions,
reproduction commands); raw per-run output, JUnit-derived case lists,
power/load logs and the one-off A/A analysis script don't belong in the
repository. Remove the raw/ directory and the links to it from
performance.md and irctest.md. The analysis script is superseded by
scripts/fanout-aa.py from #118.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@codegeek
codegeek force-pushed the chore/remove-raw-validation-data branch from 51eb291 to 60fadd9 Compare October 27, 2026 23:02

@sourcery-ai sourcery-ai Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sourcery assessment

Approved.

@sonarqubecloud

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@codegeek
codegeek merged commit 31fc00f into main Oct 27, 2026
6 checks passed
@codegeek
codegeek deleted the chore/remove-raw-validation-data branch October 27, 2026 23:30
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant