Skip to content

fix(gateway): enforce administrative and transport security boundaries - #4964

Merged
asim merged 3 commits into
masterfrom
codex/gateway-security-audit
Sep 21, 2026
Merged

asim merged 3 commits into
masterfrom
codex/gateway-security-audit

Conversation

@asim

@asim asim commented Sep 21, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

A focused audit found inconsistent authorization and browser isolation across the dashboard and MCP transports. Require a current administrator role for dashboard account/token/scope management, use context-aware HTML escaping and text-only form responses, and reject foreign browser origins by default with an exact-origin opt-in for trusted MCP clients.

Apply the configured authentication callback to streamable HTTP and WebSocket upgrades. Reinspect WebSocket credentials per tool call, and require the HTTP payment path for priced tools. Document proxy/origin configuration and the administrative boundary.

Validation: dashboard/MCP/origin package tests pass (explicit always-on sampling for in-memory tracing assertions), repository build and lint pass. Regression coverage includes user/service/admin roles and demotion, all dashboard templates, browser origins across transports, authentication callbacks, revoked credentials, and paid WebSocket calls.

Related to the audit prompted by #4925 and #4926. These issues remain open: their private reports have not been received, so this independently verified work does not claim to resolve the reporter's undisclosed findings.

@chatgpt-codex-connector

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot commented Sep 21, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review Status Commit Review trigger
📝 Code Review Completed 2026-09-21T13:32:22.794300Z 9b0978f PR opened
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 9b0978f715

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

Comment thread gateway/mcp/mcp.go
@asim
asim merged commit afd75e2 into master Sep 21, 2026
14 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant