Currently, all uploaded images are assigned a new name ("<img-0>", "<img-1>", and so on). The names are assigned based on the order in which the uploads finish, which means the numbering can effectively depend on the file sizes.
Would it be possible to take the original file names into account when assigning image names? For example, the original file name could be preserved alongside the automatically assigned "<img-0>" name.
This would make it much easier to work with a large number of images. If I want to add many images to my podcast, I currently can't prepare a text file containing references such as "<img-0>" through "<img-64>" in advance, because I don't know which image will end up with which number.
Ideally, I would be able to reference an image using either its original file name or its automatically assigned "<img-0>" name.
Currently, all uploaded images are assigned a new name
("<img-0>", "<img-1>",and so on). The names are assigned based on the order in which the uploads finish, which means the numbering can effectively depend on the file sizes.Would it be possible to take the original file names into account when assigning image names? For example, the original file name could be preserved alongside the automatically assigned
"<img-0>"name.This would make it much easier to work with a large number of images. If I want to add many images to my podcast, I currently can't prepare a text file containing references such as
"<img-0>" through "<img-64>"in advance, because I don't know which image will end up with which number.Ideally, I would be able to reference an image using either its original file name or its automatically assigned
"<img-0>"name.