Highlight warm build servers in README - #15
Merged
Merged
Conversation
neebs12
marked this pull request as ready for review
July 26, 2026 04:05
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What changed
Why
The previous warm-cache subsection documented the inputs but did not make the build-server lifecycle or practical value immediately visible. This gives readers a concrete path from the ordinary ephemeral workflow to opt-in warm reuse without hiding the security tradeoffs.
Validation
git diff --checknpm audit --audit-level=high(zero vulnerabilities)npm run checkCI dependency note
The first PR run exposed newly published high-severity advisories in transitive development dependencies already locked on
main. The PR includes a lock-only refresh forbrace-expansion,postcss, andnanoidso the required audit gate can proceed; no direct dependency or runtime code changed.