Repository navigation
feat(render): a fill light on Shaded Relief that opens the slopes in shadow (#1912) #2005
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Mavrick-F
merged 3 commits into
opengeos:main
from
elpidioassinaturas:feat/1912-fill-light
Nov 14, 2026
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
3 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
AGENTS.md (saved files):
fillis written into projects without a format bump.project::FORMATis still 1 (crates/engine/src/project.rs:58), and its doc says to advance it "when an older reader would lose meaningful saved information on resaving". An older RustGIS reads a project with"fill": 0.3, ignores the unknown key, and saves the project again without it. That is a silent loss, which the "Never silent" rule anddocs/maintaining.md#saved-files-and-settingsboth rule out.The PR does not say why no bump is needed.
shadowandskyappear to have shipped the same way under FORMAT 1, so this may be existing practice the docs have not caught up with. Either way it is a decision for the maintainers, since the project lead owns how a project stores its data. Please either bump the format (accepting that older versions refuse the file) or state why the omitted-when-zero field is acceptable, and mention the choice in the PR description.Confidence: medium. I did not check the git history for when
shadowandskywere added.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Kept as is, following
shadow(#1796) andsky(#1871), which were saved the same way under FORMAT 1:fillis written only when it isn't 0, so no existing project's file changes, and an older RustGIS draws the relief without the fill (and drops it on a resave). Bumping FORMAT would make older versions refuse every project, fill or not. The PR description now says this under Limits; moving the relief settings to a new format together is left to the maintainers.