Skip to content

build(ci): run the workflows on GitHub's runners again - #158

Merged
Kushalkhemka merged 1 commit into
pi-boltfrom
ci/github-hosted-runners
Oct 25, 2026
Merged

Kushalkhemka merged 1 commit into
pi-boltfrom
ci/github-hosted-runners

Conversation

@Kushalkhemka

@Kushalkhemka Kushalkhemka commented Oct 25, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Blacksmith's runners cost too much for this project. Every workflow returns to the GitHub-hosted labels it used before #118:

Blacksmith GitHub
blacksmith-4vcpu-ubuntu-2404 ubuntu-24.04
blacksmith-4vcpu-ubuntu-2404-arm ubuntu-24.04-arm
blacksmith-4vcpu-windows-2025 windows-2025
blacksmith-6vcpu-macos-26 macos-15

publish.yml was on GitHub's runners already. actionlint no longer needs the self-hosted labels. RELEASING.md says where releases are built and that 1.0.2 and 1.0.3's attestations name a self-hosted runner.

Kept from #118: vswhere -products * (finds Build Tools as well as the IDE) and the auth-storage test change, both runner-independent.

Builds take longer on GitHub's smaller runners (1.0.1's release: 25.9 min against 18.6 on Blacksmith; runtimes two to four hours).


View with [code]smith Autofix with [code]smith
Need help on this PR? Tag @codesmith-bot with what you need.

Blacksmith's runners cost too much for this project. Every workflow goes back to the labels it had before
#118: ubuntu-24.04, ubuntu-24.04-arm, windows-2025 and macos-15. publish.yml was on GitHub's already.
Copilot AI balanced review requested due to automatic review settings October 25, 2026 12:51

@claude claude Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Code review skipped — your organization has no extra usage available to pay for this review.

If your organization's extra usage balance is empty, an organization admin can add extra usage credits at claude.ai/admin-settings/usage. If its monthly spend limit was reached, an admin can raise it on the same page. If neither applies, contact Anthropic support.

Once extra usage is available, someone with write access to this repository can comment @claude review on this pull request to trigger a review.

Copilot AI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copilot was unable to review this pull request because the user who requested the review has insufficient remaining quota.

An organization owner can choose the repository organization as the billing source for reviews requested by members with a paid Copilot license. Learn about Copilot code review billing.

@chatgpt-codex-connector

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot commented Oct 25, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review Status Commit Review trigger
📝 Code Review ✅ Completed 2026-10-25T12:53:09.734576Z 3dcf081 PR opened
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

@Kushalkhemka
Kushalkhemka merged commit ed7061b into pi-bolt Oct 25, 2026
18 checks passed
@Kushalkhemka
Kushalkhemka deleted the ci/github-hosted-runners branch October 25, 2026 13:13
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants