[release-4.18] OCPBUGS-103360, OCPBUGS-103371: CVE-2026-33814: replace golang.org/x/net with openshift-sustaining fork - #610
Conversation
…ft-sustaining fork Same rationale/fix as OCPBUGS-102919 (release-4.16): builder is pinned to Go 1.22 (rhel-9-golang-1.22-openshift-4.18), below the go>=1.25 that golang.org/x/net@v0.53.0 requires, so uses `replace golang.org/x/net => github.com/openshift-sustaining/net v0.35.0-sec.3` instead. This branch already had a similar precedent for a different CVE (`replace google.golang.org/grpc => github.com/openshift-sustaining/grpc-go v1.71.3-sec.1`), confirming this is an established downstream fork pattern, not a one-off. go build/go vet clean; govulncheck confirms GO-2026-4918 no longer reported for ./cmd/azure-disk-csi-driver-operator/... Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
|
Important Review skippedAuto reviews are disabled on base/target branches other than the default branch. Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the ⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Repository: openshift/coderabbit/.coderabbit.yaml Review profile: CHILL Plan: Team Run ID: You can disable this status message by setting the Use the checkbox below for a quick retry:
Comment |
|
@mariocr73: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-103371, which is invalid:
Comment The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker. DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
|
Pipeline controller notification For optional jobs, comment This repository is configured in: LGTM mode |
|
/lgtm |
|
Scheduling required tests: |
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: dobsonj, mariocr73 The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here DetailsNeeds approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
|
/test unit |
|
@mariocr73: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-103360, which is invalid:
Comment The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker. This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-103371, which is invalid:
Comment The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker. DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
|
/jira refresh |
|
@mariocr73: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-103360, which is invalid:
Comment This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-103371, which is invalid:
Comment DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
|
/jira refresh |
|
@mariocr73: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-103360, which is invalid:
Comment This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-103371, which is invalid:
Comment DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
|
/test unit |
|
@mariocr73: all tests passed! Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. DetailsInstructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
|
/verified by CI |
|
@mariocr73: This PR has been marked as verified by DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
|
/jira refresh |
|
/jira refresh |
|
@openshift-merge-robot: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-103360, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. 7 validation(s) were run on this bug
No GitHub users were found matching the public email listed for the QA contact in Jira (ocp-sustaining-admins@redhat.com), skipping review request. This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-103371, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. 7 validation(s) were run on this bug
No GitHub users were found matching the public email listed for the QA contact in Jira (ocp-sustaining-admins@redhat.com), skipping review request. DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
|
@openshift-merge-robot: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-103360, which is valid. 7 validation(s) were run on this bug
No GitHub users were found matching the public email listed for the QA contact in Jira (ocp-sustaining-admins@redhat.com), skipping review request. This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-103371, which is valid. 7 validation(s) were run on this bug
No GitHub users were found matching the public email listed for the QA contact in Jira (ocp-sustaining-admins@redhat.com), skipping review request. DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
46b7804
into
openshift:release-4.18
|
@mariocr73: Jira Issue Verification Checks: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-103360 Jira Issue OCPBUGS-103360 has been moved to the MODIFIED state and will move to the VERIFIED state when the change is available in an accepted nightly payload. 🕓 Jira Issue Verification Checks: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-103371 Jira Issue OCPBUGS-103371 has been moved to the MODIFIED state and will move to the VERIFIED state when the change is available in an accepted nightly payload. 🕓 DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
Same rationale as OCPBUGS-102919 (release-4.16). Builder pinned to Go 1.22 (rhel-9-golang-1.22-openshift-4.18). Uses
replace golang.org/x/net => github.com/openshift-sustaining/net v0.35.0-sec.3.This branch already had a similar precedent for a different CVE (
replace google.golang.org/grpc => github.com/openshift-sustaining/grpc-go v1.71.3-sec.1), confirming this is an established downstream fork pattern.go build/go vet clean; govulncheck confirms GO-2026-4918 no longer reported for ./cmd/azure-disk-csi-driver-operator/....