Skip to content

Depend on blochsim, the renamed torchsim - #123

Merged
mcencini merged 3 commits into
mainfrom
claude/blochsim-rename-p5rpdr
Oct 6, 2026
Merged

mcencini merged 3 commits into
mainfrom
claude/blochsim-rename-p5rpdr

Conversation

@mcencini

@mcencini mcencini commented Oct 5, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Requested by Matteo · project thread

What changed

The dependency is blochsim>=0.0.9 instead of torchsim>=0.0.8; every import, docstring, doc page, link (now pulserver/blochsim) and test name follows (tests/test_{epg,nlop,sim}_blochsim.py).

Why

TorchSim is renamed to blochsim (pulserver/blochsim#26).

Validation

ruff check src tests and ruff format --check src tests clean. CI cannot resolve blochsim until it is published on PyPI, so this stays a draft until blochsim 0.0.9 is released.

Public API and documentation

No bartorch name changes; docs mention BlochSim and its new URL.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

https://claude.ai/code/session_01B57XCqwDsAPeMVUSDSGxc5


Generated by Claude Code

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01B57XCqwDsAPeMVUSDSGxc5

mcencini commented Oct 5, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

CI cannot install this branch until blochsim>=0.0.9 is on PyPI. That waits on pulserver/blochsim#26 merging and v0.0.9 being tagged. Install failures before then are that blocker, not this diff. The PR stays a draft, and CI will be re-run once the release is out.


Generated by Claude Code

@mcencini
mcencini marked this pull request as ready for review October 6, 2026 15:22
@codecov

codecov Bot commented Oct 6, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.

📢 Thoughts on this report? Let us know!

@mcencini
mcencini merged commit b8e685c into main Oct 6, 2026
15 checks passed
@mcencini
mcencini deleted the claude/blochsim-rename-p5rpdr branch October 6, 2026 15:51
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants