Changes for schema registry for tuning tools - #335
Conversation
The merge-base changed after approval.
The merge-base changed after approval.
|
@TeresiaOlsson I might've messed something up, please have a look once you are back to work :) |
|
@TeresiaOlsson Before merging please check that nothing got really broken after my meddling here. |
|
I will be back from holiday to tomorrow so will go through and fix the conflicts. |
…to simplify model generation for dataclasses.
Co-authored-by: gubaidulinvadim <2589030+gubaidulinvadim@users.noreply.github.com>
1def092 to
896e3dc
Compare
|
I have rebased so the tests pass now but @gubaidulinvadim what was the reason for adding |
Ahh.... It's because of the BBA. I will keep it then in this PR and remove it in another PR where I update the BBA modules since they are new. That means this PR is ready for review and merge. |
I decided to make the modifications of the tuning tools in one PR because the response matrices, measurement tools and tuning tools affect at many places.
Edit from @gubaidulinvadim : Resolves #321 #322 #323 #324 #325 #326