Skip to content

feat: probe whether each ATTENDEE comes back once - #60

Merged
tobixen merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
feat/probe-attendee-once
Nov 12, 2026
Merged

tobixen merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
feat/probe-attendee-once

Conversation

@tobixen

@tobixen tobixen commented Nov 12, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Commit message:

Bedework 5 stores every ATTENDEE of an event twice, as an exact copy.
CheckAttendeeOnce stores an event with two attendees and grades
save-load.icalendar.attendee-once: "quirk", "stored twice", for exact
copies, which caldav will drop on read (caldav PR 864), and "broken"
for copies that differ. Run against Bedework 5 it gives the quirk.
The definition is carried in FUTURE_FEATURES until a caldav release
has it.

Prompt: Please do more research on the bedework5 problem. Bedework is a static image (built locally, but I did it only once).
Followup-Prompt: [a tester probe, a caldav hint, and dropping the copies on read] sounds good. Quirk sounds good, and the caldav library should strip the duplicates.

Assisted-By: Claude Opus 5.5 noreply@anthropic.com

The caldav side is python-caldav/caldav#864.

Bedework 5 stores every ATTENDEE of an event twice, as an exact copy.
CheckAttendeeOnce stores an event with two attendees and grades
save-load.icalendar.attendee-once: "quirk", "stored twice", for exact
copies, which caldav will drop on read (caldav PR 864), and "broken"
for copies that differ.  Run against Bedework 5 it gives the quirk.
The definition is carried in FUTURE_FEATURES until a caldav release
has it.

Prompt: Please do more research on the bedework5 problem.  Bedework is a static image (built locally, but I did it only once).
Followup-Prompt: [a tester probe, a caldav hint, and dropping the copies on read] sounds good.  Quirk sounds good, and the caldav library should strip the duplicates.

Assisted-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Reviewed-by: Tobias Brox <tobias@redpill-linpro.com>
@tobixen
tobixen merged commit 8350b87 into main Nov 12, 2026
12 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant