Skip to content

BUILD-CI-14: record duplicate cache-lock comment finding - #2624

Draft
r3dbars wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
codex/review-build-ci-14-disposition
Draft

r3dbars wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
codex/review-build-ci-14-disposition

Conversation

@r3dbars

@r3dbars r3dbars commented Nov 11, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

BUILD-CI-14 duplicates the stale 30-minute cache-lock comment within TESTS-INFRA-11's PR #2448, exact head bfc3b9bac0a7763804877735335a7d475e061bc2. The actual runner already uses find -mmin +60. This dedicated disposition records the shared proposal; it adds no second implementation or behavior change. #2448 was verified an open, unmerged draft; no landed fix is claimed.

Independent review: Root read the full 24-line document, actual three-comment #2448 diff, both report entries and the real threshold; GREEN. Three current/base bindings, proposal blob and document/diff hashes verified. TESTS-INFRA-11 remains #2448's primary ID.

Validation at 337fc8885b7604f8a139537b6e21b3f37709017d: one guarded bash check.sh exited 0, 3 PASS / 0 FAIL / 1 orchestration-metadata SKIP. Raw exact-head proof archived before standalone preflight (0) and verifier (0; no app checks applied). Optional full QA bench guard refused execution (exit 3). No actual fast runner, app, native or hardware execution; no cache-concurrency proof. Hosted checks UNKNOWN at local closeout. No merge requested.

@r3dbars r3dbars added the needs owner review Owner must review before merge label Nov 11, 2026 — with ChatGPT Codex Connector

This branch has not been deployed

No deployments
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

needs owner review Owner must review before merge

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant