Skip to content

BUILD-CI-8: record duplicate workflow inventory finding - #2625

Draft
r3dbars wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
codex/review-build-ci-8-disposition
Draft

r3dbars wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
codex/review-build-ci-8-disposition

Conversation

@r3dbars

@r3dbars r3dbars commented Nov 11, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

BUILD-CI-8 and DOCS-18 report the same missing risk-triage.yml workflow-table entry. This dedicated disposition references DOCS-18's PR #2438, exact head 1300ee793fcee58d6bea70b81c0d424698e902aa, without adding a second inventory correction. #2438 was verified an open, unmerged draft. Its declared environment/secret references do not prove live configuration or gate deployment.

Independent review: Root read the full 25-line document, actual one-row #2438 diff and whole current workflow; GREEN. Four current/base bindings, proposal blob and document/diff hashes verified. DOCS-18 remains #2438's primary ID. No workflow, permission, merge-policy or Secrets-paragraph changes.

Validation at 8014be2ad52b15c2bf1b756f87d649e1be4d46b7: one guarded bash check.sh exited 0, 3 PASS / 0 FAIL / 1 orchestration-metadata SKIP. Exact-head raw proof archived before standalone preflight (0) and verifier (0; no app checks applied). Optional full QA bench guard refused execution (exit 3). No Actions, gate, administrator, app/native/hardware execution. Hosted checks UNKNOWN at local closeout. No merge requested.

@r3dbars r3dbars added the needs owner review Owner must review before merge label Nov 11, 2026 — with ChatGPT Codex Connector

This branch has not been deployed

No deployments
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

needs owner review Owner must review before merge

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant