docs: licence is Apache-2.0, not MIT (RED-1427)

[AlexisMarasigan]

LICENSE and GitHub metadata say Apache-2.0. README footer and .goreleaser.yml brew license still said MIT, so the published homebrew-tap/connect-cli.rb says MIT too. Two one-line fixes; the formula regenerates on the next release.

Jira: https://redpine.atlassian.net/browse/RED-1427

https://claude.ai/code/session_01EGRS89yGhTkyG4SrN4gnX6

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Documentation
  • Updated the project license information in the README from MIT to Apache-2.0.
  • Updated the Homebrew package license metadata to Apache-2.0 for consistency.

[coderabbitai]

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Team

Run ID: 26afd8c0-c529-444e-9af5-ef47af38501f

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between c6f7b5c and a17e06b.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)

• .goreleaser.yml
• README.md

Included review availability: 2 reviews are currently available. Your included PR review attempts over the past 7 days set your current allowance at 6 reviews per hour.

---

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The pull request changes the project license from MIT to Apache-2.0 in the GoReleaser Homebrew metadata and the README.

Changes

License metadata

Layer / File(s)	Summary
Update license metadata .goreleaser.yml, README.md	The Homebrew formula metadata and README now specify Apache-2.0 instead of MIT.

Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~2 minutes

Merge Risk: ⚪ Minimal · up to a17e0

The README and published Homebrew formula metadata now consistently identify the project as Apache-2.0. No current merge-readiness risk is identified.

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5

✅ Passed checks (5 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Description Check	✅ Passed	Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check	✅ Passed	The title clearly identifies the main change: license references changed from MIT to Apache-2.0. It also includes the related issue identifier.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check. Docstring coverage is scoped to functions touched by this diff. Analyzed 0 functions across 0…
Linked Issues check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.

Full details: Docstring Coverage

Explanation

No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check. Docstring coverage is scoped to functions touched by this diff. Analyzed 0 functions across 0 files. (2 skipped: 2 unsupported.)

✨ Finishing Touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Commit unit tests in branch fix/red-1427-licence

---

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.}