You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository was archived by the owner on Sep 16, 2026. It is now read-only.
It looks like the speedup multipliers for par_simd, ispc and ispc+tasks are incorrect given the execution time.
par_simd should be 7.37x ispc should be 2.55x ispc+tasks should be 5.09x.
And par_simd is 1.45x faster than ispc+tasks.
Also, have you since repeated these benchmarks with newer versions of the ispc compiler? Currently the setup_benchmarks.sh is pointing to 1.9.2 on LLVM 5 which was released almost 7 years ago. We are now at 1.23.0 on LLVM 16. Performance is quite a bit better as we've made improvements. These days ispc is often beating intrinsics implementations.
I'd be curious to see the results with a new compiler binary.
It looks like the speedup multipliers for
par_simd,ispcandispc+tasksare incorrect given the execution time.par_simdshould be 7.37xispcshould be 2.55xispc+tasksshould be 5.09x.And
par_simdis 1.45x faster thanispc+tasks.Also, have you since repeated these benchmarks with newer versions of the
ispccompiler? Currently thesetup_benchmarks.shis pointing to 1.9.2 on LLVM 5 which was released almost 7 years ago. We are now at 1.23.0 on LLVM 16. Performance is quite a bit better as we've made improvements. These days ispc is often beating intrinsics implementations.I'd be curious to see the results with a new compiler binary.