[oli-obk]

Seemed a small reduction in complexity to me, and has some fun minor test improvements

[rustbot]

r? @dingxiangfei2009

rustbot has assigned @dingxiangfei2009.
They will have a look at your PR within the next two weeks and either review your PR or reassign to another reviewer.

Use r? to explicitly pick a reviewer

Why was this reviewer chosen?

The reviewer was selected based on:

• Owners of files modified in this PR: compiler
• compiler expanded to 79 candidates
• Random selection from 20 candidates

[oli-obk]

@bors try @rust-timer queue

potentially perf sensitive part of #158305

[rust-bors]

☀️ Try build successful (CI)
Build commit: 0f08239 (0f0823973a95fcd0dd4f236d06152c68e87c63c4)
Base parent: 249c1e4 (249c1e4e31111b54ad2483cfd4cea06c7020c653)

[rust-timer]

Finished benchmarking commit (0f08239): comparison URL.

Overall result: no relevant changes - no action needed

Benchmarking means the PR may be perf-sensitive. Consider adding rollup=never if this change is not fit for rolling up.

@rustbot label: -S-waiting-on-perf -perf-regression

Instruction count

This perf run didn't have relevant results for this metric.

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results (primary 4.1%, secondary 1.5%)

A less reliable metric. May be of interest, but not used to determine the overall result above.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	4.1%	[2.3%, 5.9%]	2
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	1.5%	[1.5%, 1.5%]	1
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-	-	0
All ❌✅ (primary)	4.1%	[2.3%, 5.9%]	2

Cycles

This perf run didn't have relevant results for this metric.

Binary size

This perf run didn't have relevant results for this metric.

Bootstrap: 481.055s -> 481.508s (0.09%)
Artifact size: 406.29 MiB -> 406.30 MiB (0.00%)