Repository navigation
Name the copyright holder the licence requires attributing - #13
Merged
Merged
Conversation
CC BY-SA 4.0 requires attribution, and the licence text named nobody to attribute — so a reuser following the terms had no holder to credit and an ownership assessment had no answer. The notice goes above the legal code, which stays byte-for-byte unaltered so GitHub's licence detection still matches it. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> Signed-off-by: Pablo Rodriguez <contact@promontory.studio>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What changed and why
CC BY-SA 4.0 requires attribution, and the licence named nobody to attribute. The legal code was
complete but carried no
Copyright (c) <holder>line at all, so a reuser following the terms had noholder to credit, and an assessor asking who owns the Foundation's health-reasoning content found no
answer in the repository.
README.mdhad no licence section either.LICENSE— a three-line notice above the Creative Commons legal code, which is leftbyte-for-byte unaltered: 5 lines added, 0 modified, 0 removed. GitHub detects a licence by matching
that text, so leaving it untouched is what keeps
CC-BY-SA-4.0detected.README.md— a closing## Licensesection naming the holder and what the licence permits,including commercially, and noting that it is a content licence rather than a software one because
that is what this repository holds.
scripts/validate-vault.shpasses (no findings across 36 nodes). Neither addition uses the word thisrepo forbids outside a frozen
## Reasoningbody.Verify after merge
If that changes or goes null, the
LICENSEhalf reverts and the README section stays — the noticeexists so a reuser can find the holder, and the README serves that on its own.
🤖 Generated with Claude Code