State the assumptions of BlockDag and Sailfish - #233
Open
lemmy wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
Conversation
Agreement and Liveness rest on premises the modules left implicit: that F is a subset of N, that Leader maps rounds to nodes, that rounds are positive integers, and that two quorums share a correct node. Stated one by one, they are premises TLAPS can cite. TLC ignores the assumptions of an instantiated module, so TLCSailfish1, TLCSailfish2 and BlockDagTest assume each of them again. Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Signed-off-by: Markus Alexander Kuppe <github.com@lemmster.de>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
@nano-o, you contributed this spec: Could you please review and approve the following refactorings?
The goal is to eventually prove properties of the Disruptor, which needs the assumptions stated and named so a proof can cite them, and the model bounds out of the way since they are not part of what would be proved.