Reuse compression/decompression results in compression benchmarks - #9744
Reuse compression/decompression results in compression benchmarks#9744robert3005 wants to merge 3 commits into
Performance Gate Passed
⚠️ Unknown Walltime execution environment detected
Using the Walltime instrument on standard Hosted Runners will lead to inconsistent data.
For the most accurate results, we recommend using CodSpeed Macro Runners: bare-metal machines fine-tuned for performance measurement consistency.
⚠️ Different runtime environments detected
Some benchmarks with significant performance changes were compared across different runtime environments,
which may affect the accuracy of the results.
⚡ 4 improved benchmarks
✅ 2195 untouched benchmarks
⏩ 206 skipped benchmarks1
Performance Changes
| Mode | Benchmark | BASE |
HEAD |
Efficiency | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ⚡ | WallTime | arrow_checked_add_u32_neon[16384] |
20.4 µs | 12.8 µs | +59.98% |
| ⚡ | WallTime | arrow_checked_add_u32_avx2[16384] |
21.3 µs | 17.6 µs | +20.68% |
| ⚡ | WallTime | words_gather_scalar_avx2[65536] |
9.3 µs | 8.2 µs | +13.46% |
| ⚡ | Simulation | allocate_drop_arrow[0] |
456.9 ns | 402.7 ns | +13.45% |
Tip
Curious why performance improved? Comment @codspeedbot explain why performance improved on this PR, or directly use the CodSpeed MCP with your agent.
Comparing rk/compressionbench (d889616) with develop (3170657)
Footnotes
-
206 benchmarks were skipped, so the baseline results were used instead. If they were deleted from the codebase, click here and archive them to remove them from the performance reports. ↩